• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学研究受试者信息手册的可读性

Readability of subject information leaflets for medical research.

作者信息

Murphy J, Gamble G, Sharpe N

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Auckland School of Medicine.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1994 Dec 14;107(991):509-10.

PMID:7830982
Abstract

AIM

To compare the readability of adult subject information leaflets prepared for medical research projects with the readability scores of a range of New Zealand newspaper editorials and popular magazine articles.

METHODS

Of the 134 research projects approved by the Auckland Area Health Board in 1991, 99 were analysed together with nine randomly selected newspaper editorials and nine randomly selected articles from popular magazines. The Flesch reading ease index, the Flesch-Kincaid index and the Gunning fog index were calculated using a computerised grammar checker.

RESULTS

Subject information leaflets were easier to read than newspaper editorials but significantly more difficult to read than articles in popular magazines. The Flesch reading ease index showed that information leaflets had a median readability score of 53 compared with magazines which had a score of 67 and newspaper editorials which had a score of 48. The level of secondary school education required to read information leaflets was equivalent to about 2 years or form 4, whereas a level of about form 5 appears to be required to read newspaper editorials and a level of about form 1 for magazine articles.

CONCLUSIONS

The readability level of information leaflets prepared for participants in medical research in the Auckland area appears satisfactory and the process for reviewing this component of the research protocol appears consistent and effective. Readability scores may be a useful tool in assessing the overall ease with which written information can be read.

摘要

目的

比较为医学研究项目编写的成年受试者信息手册的易读性与一系列新西兰报纸社论和通俗杂志文章的易读性得分。

方法

对1991年奥克兰地区卫生局批准的134个研究项目中的99个进行分析,并随机选取9篇报纸社论和9篇通俗杂志文章一同分析。使用计算机语法检查程序计算弗莱什易读性指数、弗莱什-金凯德指数和冈宁雾度指数。

结果

受试者信息手册比报纸社论更容易阅读,但比通俗杂志文章明显更难阅读。弗莱什易读性指数显示,信息手册的平均易读性得分为53,而杂志得分为67,报纸社论得分为48。阅读信息手册所需的中学教育水平相当于大约2年或4年级,而阅读报纸社论似乎需要大约5年级的水平,阅读杂志文章需要大约1年级的水平。

结论

为奥克兰地区医学研究参与者编写的信息手册的易读性水平似乎令人满意,审查研究方案这一部分的过程似乎连贯且有效。易读性得分可能是评估书面信息总体易读程度的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Readability of subject information leaflets for medical research.医学研究受试者信息手册的可读性
N Z Med J. 1994 Dec 14;107(991):509-10.
2
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
3
Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.基于互联网的消费者健康信息的可读性评估。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.
4
Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.面向低收入人群的可读性和患者教育材料。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000343079.50214.31.
5
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
6
Written medicine information from English-speaking countries--how does it compare?来自英语国家的书面医学信息——它们有何不同?
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):285-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M402. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
7
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
8
The readability of original articles in surgical journals.外科期刊中原发性文章的可读性。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):68-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03651.x.
9
Readability of patient information leaflets on antiepileptic drugs in the UK.英国抗癫痫药物患者信息手册的可读性
Seizure. 1999 Feb;8(1):35-7. doi: 10.1053/seiz.1998.0220.
10
Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.采用 Flesch 和 Flesch-Kincaid 方法分析区综合医院提供的患者信息传单。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1824-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02408.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis.爱尔兰和英国临床研究患者信息手册及同意书的可读性与可理解性:一项回顾性定量分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e037994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994.
2
Development and Evaluation of Patient Information Leaflet for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients.糖尿病足溃疡患者患者信息手册的开发与评估
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jun 21;15(3):e55454. doi: 10.5812/ijem.55454. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
Continuing review of ethics in clinical trials: a surveillance study in Iran.
临床试验伦理的持续审查:伊朗的一项监测研究
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013 Sep 8;6:8. eCollection 2013.
4
Prescription painkillers and controlled substances: an appraisal of drug information provided by six US pharmacies.处方止痛药和管制药品:对美国六家药店提供的药品信息的评估
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2013;5:29-36. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S42508. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
5
Readability assessment of concussion and traumatic brain injury publications by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.疾病预防控制中心对脑震荡和创伤性脑损伤出版物可读性的评估。
Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:923-33. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S37110. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
6
Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials.患者对临床试验中所提供信息的认知。
J Med Ethics. 2002 Feb;28(1):45-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.1.45.
7
Relation of health literacy to gonorrhoea related care.健康素养与淋病相关护理的关系。
Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Jun;77(3):206-11. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.3.206.
8
Issues in patient compliance.患者依从性问题。
Drugs. 1997 Dec;54(6):797-800. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754060-00002.