Harrison P T, Holmes P, Humfrey C D
Medical Research Council Institute for Environment and Health, University of Leicester, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 1997 Oct 20;205(2-3):97-106. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(97)00212-x.
In recent years, evidence from disparate observations has indicated adverse changes in the reproductive health and fecundity of animals and humans. In humans, there is strong evidence for such trends in the incidences of testicular and female breast cancer, and concern has also been expressed regarding semen quality, cryptorchidism, hypospadias and polycystic ovaries. Laboratory studies have indicated that some chemicals in the environment, both natural and synthetic, have the potential to disrupt the endocrine system and that these could, at least theoretically, be partly responsible for the observed changes. Chemicals thus identified include the naturally occurring steroid hormones, phyto- and myco-estrogens, and anthropogenic chemicals such as synthetic hormones, organotins, organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, alkylphenol polyethoxylates, phthalates and bisphenol-A. While there is no direct evidence from human studies to confirm a causal link between exposure and effect, concern exists and is strengthened by reports of adverse reproductive and developmental effects in wildlife, possibly mediated via endocrine disruptive pathways. The development of imposex in neogastropod molluscs exposed to tributyltin has been attributed to such a mechanism and in wild populations of fish, alligators and birds, instances of masculinisation or feminisation in polluted areas have been noted. Among mammals, disturbed fertility of Florida panthers and some marine species has also been reported. A concentrated research and monitoring programme is required to clarify the nature and extent of effects on reproductive health in humans and wildlife, and to assess human and wildlife exposure to relevant naturally occurring or anthropogenic endocrine disrupting substances. This will enable a more robust evaluation of the contribution that environmental chemical exposure may have on adverse trends in the reproductive health of humans and wildlife.
近年来,来自不同观察结果的证据表明,动物和人类的生殖健康及生育能力出现了不良变化。在人类中,有强有力的证据表明睾丸癌和女性乳腺癌发病率呈现出此类趋势,人们还对精液质量、隐睾症、尿道下裂和多囊卵巢表示担忧。实验室研究表明,环境中的一些天然和合成化学物质有可能扰乱内分泌系统,并且至少从理论上来说,这些化学物质可能是造成所观察到变化的部分原因。由此确定的化学物质包括天然存在的类固醇激素、植物雌激素和真菌雌激素,以及人为化学物质,如合成激素、有机锡、有机氯农药、多氯联苯、二恶英、烷基酚聚乙氧基化物、邻苯二甲酸盐和双酚A。虽然人体研究中没有直接证据证实接触与影响之间存在因果关系,但人们对此表示担忧,而野生动物出现不良生殖和发育影响的报告更是加剧了这种担忧,这些影响可能是通过内分泌干扰途径介导的。新腹足类软体动物接触三丁基锡后出现性畸变就归因于这样一种机制,在鱼类、短吻鳄和鸟类的野生种群中,也注意到了污染地区出现雄性化或雌性化的情况。在哺乳动物中,也有报道称佛罗里达美洲狮和一些海洋物种的生育能力受到了干扰。需要开展一项集中的研究和监测计划,以阐明对人类和野生动物生殖健康影响的性质和程度,并评估人类和野生动物接触相关天然存在或人为的内分泌干扰物质的情况。这将有助于更有力地评估环境化学物质接触可能对人类和野生动物生殖健康不良趋势产生的影响。