Suppr超能文献

不同诊断标准对痴呆症患病率的影响。

The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia.

作者信息

Erkinjuntti T, Ostbye T, Steenhuis R, Hachinski V

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 4;337(23):1667-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712043372306.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are several widely used sets of criteria for the diagnosis of dementia, but little is known about their degree of agreement and their effects on estimates of the prevalence of dementia.

METHODS

We examined 1879 men and women 65 years of age or older who were enrolled in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging and calculated the proportion given a diagnosis of dementia according to six commonly used classification systems: the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), third edition (DSM-III), the third edition, revised of the DSM (DSM-III-R), the fourth edition of the DSM (DSM-IV), the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th revision (ICD-9) and 10th revision (ICD-10), and the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX). The degree of concordance among classification schemes and the importance of various factors in determining diagnostic agreement or disagreement were examined.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects with dementia varied from 3.1 percent when we used the criteria of the ICD-10 to 29.1 percent when the DSM-III criteria were used. The six classification systems identified different groups of subjects as having dementia; only 20 subjects were given a diagnosis of dementia according to all six systems. The classifications based on the various systems differed little according to the patients' age, sex, educational level, or status with respect to institutionalization. The factors that most often caused disagreement in diagnosis between DSM-III and ICD-10 were long-term memory, executive function, social activities, and duration of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The commonly used criteria for diagnosis can differ by a factor of 10 in the number of subjects classified as having dementia. Such disagreement has serious implications for research and treatment, as well as for the right of many older persons to drive, make a will, and handle financial affairs.

摘要

背景

有几套广泛应用的痴呆诊断标准,但对于它们之间的一致程度以及对痴呆患病率估计的影响,人们却知之甚少。

方法

我们对参加加拿大健康与老龄化研究的1879名65岁及以上的男性和女性进行了检查,并根据六种常用的分类系统计算了被诊断为痴呆的比例,这六种系统分别是:美国精神病学协会的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)第三版(DSM-III)、第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)、第四版(DSM-IV)、世界卫生组织的《国际疾病分类》第九版(ICD-9)和第十版(ICD-10),以及剑桥老年精神障碍检查(CAMDEX)。我们研究了各分类方案之间的一致程度以及各种因素在确定诊断一致或不一致方面的重要性。

结果

使用ICD-10标准时,痴呆患者的比例为3.1%,而使用DSM-III标准时为29.1%。这六种分类系统将不同的受试者群体识别为患有痴呆;只有20名受试者根据所有六种系统都被诊断为痴呆。基于不同系统的分类在患者的年龄、性别、教育水平或机构化状态方面差异不大。导致DSM-III和ICD-10之间诊断分歧最常见的因素是长期记忆、执行功能、社交活动和症状持续时间。

结论

常用的诊断标准在被归类为患有痴呆的受试者数量上可能相差10倍。这种分歧对研究和治疗以及许多老年人的驾驶、立遗嘱和处理财务事务的权利都有严重影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验