• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪体验中的个体差异。

Individual differences in the experience of emotions.

作者信息

Winter K A, Kuiper N A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 1997 Nov;17(7):791-821. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00057-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00057-3
PMID:9397338
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to highlight the important role of individual difference factors in the experience of emotion. We begin by describing several commonalties across two major approaches to the study of emotion, namely, the neuropsychological and cognitive perspectives. Both approaches provide some degree of support for the role of individual differences and cognitive factors in the experience of emotion. This paper builds on these commonalities by reviewing personality and psychopathology findings that indicate the contribution of both positive and negative personality characteristics (e.g., extraversion, optimism vs. neuroticism, trait anxiety) to the types of cognitive appraisals and emotional responses exhibited by different individuals. A self-schema model of emotion is presented as a means of integrating more fully this individual differences perspective with a theory of emotion. In this model, self-schema content provides the basis for individual differences in underlying core themes and self-evaluative beliefs. The model describes how self-schema content distinctions across individuals may have a differential impact on the initial processing of an event, evaluation of this event with respect to the self, and emotional and behavioral output. Several examples are then presented to illustrate the increased predictability afforded by this individual differences-based self-schema model of emotion. The application of this model to treatment and prevention issues in clinical and health psychology is also briefly considered. Finally, the model is integrated with other theoretical perspectives on emotion by describing a number of additional research and theoretical implications. Emphasis is placed on the need for further clarification of both cognitive and emotional components of an individual differences perspective on the study of emotions.

摘要

本文的目的是强调个体差异因素在情绪体验中的重要作用。我们首先描述情绪研究的两种主要方法,即神经心理学和认知视角的几个共同点。这两种方法都为个体差异和认知因素在情绪体验中的作用提供了一定程度的支持。本文通过回顾人格和精神病理学研究结果来建立在这些共同点之上,这些结果表明积极和消极的人格特征(如外向性、乐观与神经质、特质焦虑)对不同个体表现出的认知评估类型和情绪反应的贡献。提出了一种情绪自我图式模型,作为将这种个体差异视角与情绪理论更充分整合的一种方式。在这个模型中,自我图式内容为潜在核心主题和自我评估信念中的个体差异提供了基础。该模型描述了个体之间自我图式内容的差异如何可能对事件的初始处理、相对于自我对该事件的评估以及情绪和行为输出产生不同的影响。然后给出几个例子来说明这种基于个体差异的情绪自我图式模型所带来的更高的可预测性。还简要考虑了该模型在临床和健康心理学的治疗与预防问题中的应用。最后,通过描述一些额外的研究和理论意义,将该模型与其他情绪理论视角进行整合。重点在于需要进一步阐明个体差异视角在情绪研究中的认知和情绪成分。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the experience of emotions.情绪体验中的个体差异。
Clin Psychol Rev. 1997 Nov;17(7):791-821. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00057-3.
2
Negative emotion differentiation: its personality and well-being correlates and a comparison of different assessment methods.消极情绪分化:其与人格和幸福感的关联以及不同评估方法的比较
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(7):1196-213. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.875890. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
Effects of positive emotion, extraversion, and dopamine on cognitive stability-flexibility and frontal EEG asymmetry.积极情绪、外向性和多巴胺对认知稳定性-灵活性和额 EEG 不对称性的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jan;55(1). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12727. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
The person in political emotion.政治情感的人。
J Pers. 2010 Dec;78(6):1827-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00671.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
5
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability.神经质可能并不反映情绪的可变性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9270-9276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919934117. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Current theoretical models of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): conceptual review and treatment implications.广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的当前理论模型:概念综述及治疗启示
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1011-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
8
Disentangling beliefs about emotions from emotion schemas.从情绪图式中厘清情绪信念。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;77(4):1068-1089. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23098. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
9
Successful emotion regulation is predicted by amygdala activity and aspects of personality: A latent variable approach.杏仁核活动和人格特质可预测情绪调节的成功:一种潜在变量方法。
Emotion. 2017 Apr;17(3):421-441. doi: 10.1037/emo0000215. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Emotion and self-cutting: narratives of service users referred to a personality disorder service.情感与自我切割:转介至人格障碍服务机构的服务使用者的叙述
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(2):125-32. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1870. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dark Side of Employee's Leadership Potential: Its Impact on Leader Jealousy and Ostracism.员工领导潜力的阴暗面:其对领导者嫉妒和排斥行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;15(8):1001. doi: 10.3390/bs15081001.
2
Emotion-Guided Attention Impacts Deliberate Multi-Evidence Emotion-Related Perceptual Decision-Making.情绪引导的注意力影响刻意的多证据情绪相关知觉决策。
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70059. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70059.
3
From Emotional (Dys)Regulation to Internet Addiction: A Mediation Model of Problematic Social Media Use among Italian Young Adults.
从情绪(失调)调节到网络成瘾:意大利青年成人中社交媒体使用问题的中介模型
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):188. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010188.
4
Personality first in emotion: a deep neural network based on electroencephalogram channel attention for cross-subject emotion recognition.情感中人格优先:基于脑电图通道注意力的深度神经网络用于跨主体情感识别
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Aug 18;8(8):201976. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201976. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Effects of early and later life environmental enrichment and personality on attention bias in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).早期和后期生活环境丰容以及个性对猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)注意偏向的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):959-972. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01287-w. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Facebook Addiction: Onset Predictors.脸书成瘾:发病预测因素。
J Clin Med. 2018 May 23;7(6):118. doi: 10.3390/jcm7060118.
7
The Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale: reliability and validity of a brief screening test.卑尔根购物成瘾量表:一项简短筛查测试的信度和效度
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 17;6:1374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01374. eCollection 2015.
8
Distinctive amygdala subregions involved in emotion-modulated Stroop interference.参与情绪调节 Stroop 干扰的杏仁核亚区具有独特性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):689-98. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst021. Epub 2013 Mar 29.