Chouinard S, Louis E D, Fahn S
Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Mov Disord. 1997 Nov;12(6):973-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120621.
Even though essential tremor (ET) is the most prevalent movement disorder, there has been little agreement in the neurologic literature regarding diagnostic criteria for ET. The authors attempted to determine the extent and source of agreement and disagreement among neurologists regarding diagnostic criteria for clinically definite ET. The authors designed and mailed a semistructured questionnaire to 160 neurologists who specialize in movement disorders in 24 countries. The questionnaire included three sections: a list of inclusion criteria, a list of exclusion criteria, and a list of potential clinical scenarios (for example, isolated site-specific tremor and primary orthostatic tremor). The questionnaire was completed by 98 (61%) of 160 targeted neurologists. There was greater consensus regarding features considered unnecessary inclusion criteria for clinically definite ET (extent of disability, disease duration, and positive family history) than for those considered necessary inclusion criteria (postural versus action tremor). With regard to exclusion criteria, there was some consensus in terms of the presence of Parkinson's disease, dystonia, history of hyperthyroidism or concurrent use of tremor-inducing medications, and cerebellar signs. The majority of neurologists would diagnose ET in the setting of isolated head or voice tremor. There are areas of both consensus and divergence among neurologists with regard to diagnostic criteria for ET. The choice of diagnostic criteria may vary depending on the intended use of the criteria (that is, clinical versus genetic studies). Hopefully, this study will foster further discussion to achieve a more general consensus.
尽管特发性震颤(ET)是最常见的运动障碍,但神经学文献中对于ET的诊断标准几乎没有达成一致意见。作者试图确定神经科医生在临床确诊ET的诊断标准方面的共识程度和来源,以及存在分歧的地方。作者设计并向24个国家的160名专门从事运动障碍研究的神经科医生邮寄了一份半结构化问卷。问卷包括三个部分:纳入标准列表、排除标准列表以及一系列可能的临床情况(例如,孤立的特定部位震颤和原发性直立性震颤)。160名目标神经科医生中有98名(61%)完成了问卷。对于临床确诊ET被认为不必要的纳入标准(残疾程度、病程和家族史阳性),相比那些被认为必要的纳入标准(姿势性震颤与动作性震颤),存在更大的共识。关于排除标准,在帕金森病、肌张力障碍、甲状腺功能亢进病史或同时使用诱发震颤的药物以及小脑体征方面存在一些共识。大多数神经科医生会在孤立的头部或声音震颤情况下诊断为ET。在ET的诊断标准方面,神经科医生之间既有共识也有分歧。诊断标准的选择可能因标准的预期用途(即临床研究与基因研究)而异。希望这项研究将促进进一步的讨论,以达成更广泛的共识。