• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer.

作者信息

Albertsen P C, Nease R F, Potosky A L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1998 Jan;159(1):158-63. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64043-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64043-6
PMID:9400461
Abstract

PURPOSE

We developed a self-administered paper based instrument to assess patient preferences quantified as utilities for common outcomes associated with the management of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients was invited to test a self-administered paper based instrument designed to assess preferences for health outcomes associated with the management of localized prostate cancer. The 50 patients were selected from a group of 625 randomly identified men with prostate cancer who responded to a survey instrument designed to assess health related quality of life. The 50 patients selected for this pilot project were chosen because of the wide range of responses to the quality of life survey. Patient utilities were assessed for the 5 health states of overall quality of life, problems related to prostate cancer, and problems related to urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunction.

RESULTS

Patients were able to complete the assigned tasks. The self-administered instrument had high test-retest reliability. In addition results obtained from this instrument showed a correlation with results obtained from assessments using other instruments, including an analog scale, a computer based system known as U-Titer, a quality of life survey and the Health Utility Index:3.

CONCLUSIONS

A self-administered paper based instrument can be used to assess patient utilities for health states associated with prostate cancer management. Results from the instrument tested appear to be reliable and valid, and are comparable to those obtained from other assessment techniques. A self-administered paper based instrument has distinct advantages when conducting large survey studies because it can be incorporated at relatively low cost.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer.
J Urol. 1998 Jan;159(1):158-63. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64043-6.
2
Assessing quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: development of a new instrument for use in multiple settings.评估临床局限性前列腺癌男性的生活质量:一种适用于多种环境的新工具的开发。
Qual Life Res. 2000;9(6):645-65. doi: 10.1023/a:1008931703884.
3
Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy.前列腺癌患者及社区对治疗结果的偏好:对临床政策的影响
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):153-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00017.
4
Quality of life and treatment outcomes: prostate carcinoma patients' perspectives after prostatectomy or radiation therapy.生活质量与治疗结果:前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后或放疗后的观点
Cancer. 1997 May 15;79(10):1977-86. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<1977::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-r.
5
Predicting utility scores for prostate cancer: mapping the Prostate Cancer Index to the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS).预测前列腺癌的效用评分:将前列腺癌指数映射到患者导向的前列腺效用量表(PORPUS)。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Mar;17(1):47-56. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.44. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
6
Measuring health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.
J Urol. 1994 Nov;152(5 Pt 2):1882-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32407-2.
7
Utilities for prostate cancer health states in men aged 60 and older.
Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):347-55. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000156862.33341.45.
8
Patient preferences for outcomes associated with surgical management of prostate cancer.患者对前列腺癌手术治疗相关结局的偏好。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2117-22.
9
Predictors of utilities for health states in early stage prostate cancer.
J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):942-6.
10
Health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment, 1990-2000.1990 - 2000年前列腺癌筛查与治疗研究中的健康相关生活质量、满意度及经济结果指标
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004(33):78-101. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh016.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Utility Book (HUB)-Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer.健康效用手册(HUB)-癌症:癌症健康状态效用值系统文献综述方案
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Aug 13;4(2):2381468319852594. doi: 10.1177/2381468319852594. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
2
Recovery of pad-free continence in elderly men does not differ from younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for aggressive prostate cancer.对于接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗侵袭性前列腺癌的老年男性,无垫控尿功能的恢复与年轻男性无差异。
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02797-5. Epub 2019 May 11.
3
A Framework for Treatment Decision Making at Prostate Cancer Recurrence.
前列腺癌复发治疗决策框架。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Nov;37(8):905-913. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17711913. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后即刻控尿的预测因素
World J Urol. 2016 Jan;34(1):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4. Epub 2015 May 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the KineSpring ® Knee Implant System in the treatment for knee osteoarthritis.KineSpring ® 膝关节植入系统治疗膝骨关节炎的成本效益和经济影响。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Nov;21(11):2629-37. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2427-x. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
6
Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术的护理质量差异。
Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Apr;4(2):61-75. doi: 10.1177/1756287211433187.
7
Changes in health utilities and health-related quality of life over 12 months following radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后12个月内健康效用和健康相关生活质量的变化。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Dec;3(6):445-52. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1171.
8
Caring for the Uninsured with Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Four Policy Alternatives in California.关爱未参保前列腺癌患者:加利福尼亚州四种政策选择之比较
J Community Health. 2010 Feb;35(1):18-26. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9199-8.
9
Work-in-progress toward incorporating patients' preferences in practice guidelines for imaging aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.在将患者偏好纳入颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血实践指南方面的工作进展。
Acad Radiol. 2009 May;16(5):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.003.
10
Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients.视觉模拟量表(VAS)得出的标准博弈(SG)效用与健康效用指数效用是否一致?类风湿性关节炎患者对健康状况的患者和社区偏好比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Apr 20;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-25.