Shah D C, Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Chouairi S, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Garrigue S, Clémenty J
Service d'Electrophysiologie Cardiaque, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévèque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Circulation. 1997 Dec 2;96(11):3904-12. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.11.3904.
The full circuit of common atrial flutter using conventional methods of sequential or multielectrode activation mapping is not completely understood.
We performed three-dimensional right atrial endocardial activation mapping during common counterclockwise atrial flutter in 17 patients (16 men, 1 woman; mean age, 53+/-11 years) by using the Cordis-Biosense EP Navigation system and assessed the distribution of estimated conduction velocities and double and fractionated potentials. ECG flutter wave morphologies were compared with activation patterns. Points (91+/-29) were sequentially acquired covering 88+/-11% of the flutter cycle length of 239+/-22 ms. A wide and variable posterior zone of double and fractionated potentials coincided with blocking and colliding wave fronts and formed the posterior limit of the circuit. A progressively widening septal (sep) wave front ascending from just beyond the coronary sinus ostium, passed cranially as a broad front anterior to the superior vena cava (SVC) in 14 patients, whereas fusion around the SVC formed the superior (sup) limb of the circuit in 3. Bounded anteriorly by the tricuspid valve, the wave front descended down the lateral (lat) aspect of the right atrium before completing the circuit in all cases through the inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus isthmus. The estimated conduction velocity in the medial isthmus (0.6+/-0.3 m/s) was lower than in the other limbs of the circuit (sup=1+/-0.5 m/s, lat=1+/-0.5 m/s, sep=0.9+/-0.4 m/s, P=.05). Double and fractionated potentials were constant and more prevalent in the posterior right atrium. ECG flutter wave morphology did not correlate with three-dimensional activation maps.
Interindividual variations occur in the right atrial circuit of common atrial flutter, with constant activation through the cavotricuspid isthmus. A variable zone of block forms the posterior limit. Fusion around the SVC can occur, and ascending medial septal activation does not follow a consistent pattern.
使用传统的顺序或多电极激动标测方法对常见心房扑动的完整环路尚未完全了解。
我们使用Cordis-Biosense EP导航系统,对17例患者(16例男性,1例女性;平均年龄53±11岁)在常见逆时针心房扑动期间进行了三维右心房心内膜激动标测,并评估了估计的传导速度以及双电位和碎裂电位的分布。将心电图扑动波形态与激动模式进行比较。依次采集了91±29个点,覆盖了239±22毫秒扑动周期长度的88±11%。一个宽阔且可变的双电位和碎裂电位后区与阻滞和碰撞的波前重合,形成了环路的后边界。一个从冠状窦口稍远处开始逐渐增宽的间隔波前,在14例患者中作为一个宽阔的波前在头侧经过上腔静脉(SVC)前方,而在3例患者中,SVC周围的融合形成了环路的上支。波前在三尖瓣前方受限于前侧,在右心房外侧向下延伸,然后在所有病例中通过下腔静脉-三尖瓣环峡部完成环路。内侧峡部的估计传导速度(0.6±0.3米/秒)低于环路的其他分支(上支=1±0.5米/秒,外侧=1±0.5米/秒,间隔=0.9±0.4米/秒,P=0.05)。双电位和碎裂电位在右心房后部恒定且更普遍。心电图扑动波形态与三维激动图不相关。
常见心房扑动的右心房环路存在个体差异,通过腔静脉-三尖瓣峡部有恒定的激动。一个可变的阻滞区形成后边界。SVC周围可发生融合,内侧间隔的上升激动不遵循一致模式。