Smith S E, Harris W H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Dec;79(12):1827-33. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199712000-00008.
Fifty-two consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties were performed in forty-seven unselected patients by one surgeon. The prosthesis included a hemispherical porous-coated acetabular component, inserted without cement and with the use of screws through three peripheral flanges, and a femoral component, inserted with a so-called second-generation cementing technique. No patient was lost to radiographic follow-up, and the clinical result was known for all patients. The average age at the time of the index operation was fifty-seven years (range, twenty-nine to seventy-nine years). Four patients (four hips) who died were last examined less than ten years postoperatively (the minimum follow-up period for this study) and one hip was revised, leaving forty-seven non-revised hips in forty-two surviving patients who were followed for at least ten years. The duration of clinical follow-up of these forty-two patients averaged 12.3 years (range, 10.8 to 13.3 years), and the duration of radiographic follow-up averaged 12.1 years (range, 10.0 to 13.0 years). One (2 per cent) of the original fifty-two hips was revised for late recurrent dislocation, without loosening, 9.7 years after the index arthroplasty. The rate of dislocation was relatively high (13 per cent; seven hips), and we believed it to be related to the shallow-chamfer acetabular design combined with the small femoral head. At the time of the latest follow-up, no femoral component was loose. One (2 per cent) of the fifty-two acetabular components was loose according to radiographic criteria, but the hip functioned well (Harris hip score, 94 points) 12.4 years after the index arthroplasty. Pelvic osteolysis developed in one hip (2 per cent); femoral osteolysis, in eight (15 per cent); and distal femoral osteolysis, in three (6 per cent). The average Harris hip score for the forty-seven non-revised hips increased from 48 points (range, 26 to 63 points) preoperatively to 89 points (range, 67 to 100 points) at the time of the most recent follow-up. Forty (85 per cent) of the forty-seven hips had a good or excellent result, whereas five (11 per cent) had a fair result (score, 74 to 79 points) and two (4 per cent) had a poor result (score, 67 and 69 points). The hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty resulted in very good clinical function at ten to thirteen years, although the rate of dislocation was high.
一位外科医生为47例未经挑选的患者连续实施了52例初次全髋关节置换术。假体包括一个半球形多孔涂层髋臼组件,不用骨水泥植入,通过三个周边凸缘使用螺钉固定,以及一个股骨组件,采用所谓的第二代骨水泥技术植入。所有患者均未失访,且所有患者的临床结果均已知晓。初次手术时的平均年龄为57岁(范围为29至79岁)。4例(4髋)死亡患者在术后不到10年(本研究的最短随访期)接受了最后一次检查,1髋进行了翻修,42例存活患者中有47髋未翻修,这些患者至少随访了10年。这42例患者的临床随访时间平均为12.3年(范围为10.8至13.3年),影像学随访时间平均为12.1年(范围为10.0至13.0年)。最初的52髋中有1髋(2%)在初次置换术后9.7年因晚期复发性脱位进行了翻修,无松动。脱位率相对较高(13%;7髋),我们认为这与浅倒角髋臼设计结合小股骨头有关。在最近一次随访时,无股骨组件松动。根据影像学标准,52个髋臼组件中有1个(2%)松动,但该髋关节在初次置换术后12.4年功能良好(Harris髋关节评分94分)。1髋(2%)出现骨盆骨溶解;8髋(15%)出现股骨骨溶解;3髋(6%)出现股骨远端骨溶解。47个未翻修髋关节的Harris髋关节评分平均从术前的48分(范围为26至63分)提高到最近一次随访时的89分(范围为67至100分)。47髋中有40髋(85%)结果良好或优秀,5髋(11%)结果尚可(评分74至79分),2髋(4%)结果较差(评分67和69分)。尽管脱位率较高,但混合式初次全髋关节置换术在10至13年时临床功能良好。