They were cheap and available: prisoners as research subjects in twentieth century America.
作者信息
Hornblum A M
机构信息
Department of Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122-2585, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 1997 Nov 29;315(7120):1437-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7120.1437.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
They were cheap and available: prisoners as research subjects in twentieth century America.它们价格低廉且容易获得：20世纪美国将囚犯作为研究对象。
BMJ. 1997 Nov 29;315(7120):1437-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7120.1437.
2
The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.《纽伦堡法典》、德国法律以及杰出的医学思想家。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 5;277(9):709; author reply 709-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.9.709b.
3
Ethical aerobics: ACHRE's flight from responsibility.道德有氧运动：总统委员会对辐射及其他人体实验的咨询委员会逃避责任之举
Account Res. 1998 Jan;6(1-2):15-61. doi: 10.1080/08989629808573920.
4
Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code.《纽伦堡法典》之前人体实验中的知情同意
BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1445-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1445.
5
Remedies for human subjects of cold war research: recommendations of the Advisory Committee.
J Law Med Ethics. 1996 Summer;24(2):118-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1996.tb01844.x.
6
Protection of human subjects.保护人类受试者。
Code Fed Regul Public Welfare. 1995 Oct 1;Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409).
7
Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners. The Green Committee.
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1672-5.
8
Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.披露与同意：透过冷战视角
Account Res. 1998 Jan;6(1-2):1-14. doi: 10.1080/08989629808573919.
9
Radiation.辐射
JAMA. 1996 Aug 7;276(5):421-3.
10
War crimes and medical science.战争罪行与医学
BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1413-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1413.
引用本文的文献
1
Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum.在整个刑事法律领域，利益相关者参与的研究是必要的。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 15;7(1):e5. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.501. eCollection 2023.
2
Charting the Hidden City: Collecting Prison Social Network Data.绘制隐藏的城市：收集监狱社会网络数据
Soc Networks. 2022 May;69:170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.无论是否发生突变，直接导致肿瘤状态（即细胞永生化和自主性）的因素仍然未知，这应该是我们研究中的优先事项。
J Cancer. 2022 Jul 4;13(9):2810-2843. doi: 10.7150/jca.72628. eCollection 2022.
4
Is It Ethical to Mandate Vaccination among Incarcerated Persons? Consider Enforcement and Ask People Living in Prisons and Jails.强制在被监禁者中接种疫苗是否合乎伦理？考虑执法情况并询问监狱和看守所中的在押人员。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Nov;22(11):W7-W8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089290. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
What Animal Cancers teach us about Human Biology.动物癌症研究对人类生物学的启示
Theranostics. 2021 May 3;11(14):6682-6702. doi: 10.7150/thno.56623. eCollection 2021.
6
Care for Incarcerated Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.照料因 COVID-19 住院的监禁患者。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2094-2099. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06861-y. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Medication assisted treatment (MAT) in criminal justice settings as a double-edged sword: balancing novel addiction treatments and voluntary participation.刑事司法环境中的药物辅助治疗（MAT）是一把双刃剑：平衡新型成瘾治疗与自愿参与。
Health Justice. 2020 Mar 14;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40352-020-0106-9.
8
Balancing the Rights to Protection and Participation: A Call for Expanded Access to Ethically Conducted Correctional Health Research.平衡保护和参与的权利：呼吁扩大获得符合伦理的惩教卫生研究的机会。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):764-768. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4318-9. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
"Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.“以目标为导向教学”以更好地评估被监禁的临床研究参与者对知情同意的理解
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):862-872. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.peer3-1709.
10
Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants.临床研究中对囚犯的剥削：研究参与者的看法。
IRB. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):7-12.
Zotero 插件