Pietromonaco P R, Barrett L F
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003-7710, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Dec;73(6):1409-23. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1409.
This study tested whether working models of attachment guide how people construe and respond to social interactions by examining immediate responses to a range of everyday interactions and to specific attachment-relevant interactions. Patterns for immediate reports were compared with those for more memory-based, global reports. Secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing participants provided immediate reports after their social interactions for 1 week and completed retrospective questionnaires. Attachment differences were accentuated in attachment-relevant, high-conflict interactions. Preoccupied participants responded more favorably after conflict than did secure or dismissing-models contribute to perceptions may depend on the fit between attachment goals and the situation and on the extent of memory-based processing.
本研究通过考察对一系列日常互动和特定依恋相关互动的即时反应，来测试依恋工作模型是否指导人们理解和应对社会互动。将即时报告的模式与基于更多记忆的整体报告的模式进行比较。安全型、痴迷型、恐惧型和疏离型参与者在社交互动1周后提供即时报告，并完成回顾性问卷。在与依恋相关的高冲突互动中，依恋差异更为明显。痴迷型参与者在冲突后的反应比安全型或疏离型参与者更积极。依恋模型对认知的影响可能取决于依恋目标与情境的匹配程度以及基于记忆的加工程度。
