• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术术后腹腔内脓肿:一家地区综合医院 516 例连续病例的经验。

Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.

机构信息

Department of General & Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 2DH, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2351-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2778-2. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2778-2
PMID:23355169
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of intra-abdominal collections (IACs) in all patients undergoing laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) from April 2009 to October 2011 in a district general hospital with expertise in minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing appendicectomy in the specified time period was carried out. IACs were identified from various in-hospital data resources. Severity of appendicitis was assessed from histology reports.

RESULTS

516 patients were identified, of whom 242 (47 %) underwent OA and 274 (53 %) LA. Twenty-six (5 %) patients were found to have IACs postoperatively. Fifteen (5.5 %) IACs were identified in the laparoscopic group and 11 (4.5 %) in the open group. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of developing IACs in open versus laparoscopic groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, confidence interval (CI) 0.55-2.70, P = 0.63]. Patients were twelve times more likely to develop IACs with an appendix identified as being necrotic or perforated on histology (OR 12.24, CI 5.29-28.32, P < 0.0001). There was a trend towards shorter total hospital stay in the LA (3.58 days, CI 3.0-4.1 days) compared with OA (4.31 days, CI 3.7-4.9 days, P = 0.082) group, although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased rates of IAC following LA have been identified in some studies. Our series shows that, in a centre with adequate MIS experience, the IAC rate following LA is comparable to that of the open approach and should not deter surgeons with adequate support and resources.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估 2009 年 4 月至 2011 年 10 月期间在一家具有微创外科专业知识的地区综合医院中接受腹腔镜(LA)和开放阑尾切除术(OA)的所有患者的腹腔内脓肿(IAC)发生率。

方法

对指定时间段内接受阑尾切除术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。从各种院内数据资源中确定 IAC。从组织学报告评估阑尾炎的严重程度。

结果

共确定了 516 例患者,其中 242 例(47%)接受 OA,274 例(53%)接受 LA。术后发现 26 例(5%)患者存在 IAC。腹腔镜组中发现 15 例(5.5%)IAC,开放组中发现 11 例(4.5%)。开放组与腹腔镜组发生 IAC 的风险无统计学差异[比值比(OR)1.22,置信区间(CI)0.55-2.70,P=0.63]。组织学上发现阑尾坏死或穿孔的患者发生 IAC 的可能性增加 12 倍(OR 12.24,CI 5.29-28.32,P<0.0001)。LA(3.58 天,CI 3.0-4.1 天)的总住院时间比 OA(4.31 天,CI 3.7-4.9 天)短,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.082)。

结论

一些研究表明,LA 后 IAC 的发生率增加。我们的系列研究表明,在具有足够微创外科经验的中心,LA 后 IAC 的发生率与开放方法相当,并且不应阻止具有足够支持和资源的外科医生进行手术。

相似文献

1
Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术术后腹腔内脓肿:一家地区综合医院 516 例连续病例的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2351-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2778-2. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
2
Comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in children.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿形成的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 May;20(4):391-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0193.
3
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
4
Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;1(2):188-92; discussion 192-3. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80108-4.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children: a UK District General Hospital experience.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一家英国地区综合医院的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Feb;49(2):277-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.11.039. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
6
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于开腹手术治疗复杂阑尾炎。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2072-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06746-6. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Effects of Sequence of Irrigation, Suction, and Extraction in Cases of Acute Purulent Appendicitis or Gangrenous Perforated Appendicitis After Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后急性化脓性阑尾炎或坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎冲洗、抽吸和提取顺序的影响。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jul;31(7):751-755. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0610. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
Laparoscopic or open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy and evaluation of foetal outcome in Australia.澳大利亚针对疑似妊娠合并阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜或开腹阑尾切除术及胎儿结局评估
ANZ J Surg. 2017 May;87(5):334-338. doi: 10.1111/ans.13750. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
9
Risk factors for post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess.阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的危险因素。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 May;69(5):373-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01576.x.
10
Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在全国队列中的短期并发症和长期发病率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9552. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective validation of a therapeutic algorithm for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿治疗算法的前瞻性验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4929-4934. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11908-w. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
2
Development in the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis: A single-center experience.急性阑尾炎外科治疗的进展:单中心经验。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2020 Jan-Jun;17(1-2):5-9. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_77_17.
3
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008.美国急性阑尾炎的流行病学变化:研究期间为 1993 年至 2008 年。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.成人腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的结局比较:来自 2006-2008 年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Dec;15(12):2226-31. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1613-8. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
3
Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于开腹手术治疗复杂阑尾炎。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2072-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06746-6. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Prospective Observational Study on acute Appendicitis Worldwide (POSAW).全球急性阑尾炎前瞻性观察研究(POSAW)。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr 16;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0179-0. eCollection 2018.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.系统评价和荟萃分析:腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的成人患者:文献更新。
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3083-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4123-3.
6
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理。2015年欧洲内镜外科学会共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Underweight body mass index as a predictive factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic appendectomy.低体重指数作为腹腔镜阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的预测因素。
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Nov;55(6):1611-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1611.
8
Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment.现代阑尾炎:普遍存在的问题与多样化的治疗方法
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1897-902. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3882-2. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of antibiotic versus appendicectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎疗效的Meta分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1181-1186. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1584. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后腹腔脓肿发生率的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2678-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1628-y. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
4
Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess?开腹或腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用术中冲洗是否能减少术后腹腔内脓肿的发生?
Am Surg. 2011 Jan;77(1):78-80.
5
A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的简要回顾:问题与证据。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Mar;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0656-2. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
6
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术的比较——随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的Meta 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic option in evaluating chronic unexplained right iliac fossa pain.腹腔镜检查在诊断和治疗慢性不明原因右髂窝疼痛中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2793-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1049-3. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Should the macroscopically normal appendix be removed during laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain when no other explanatory pathology is found?当在腹腔镜检查中未发现其他可解释的病变时,对于急性右下腹疼痛,是否应切除宏观上正常的阑尾?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):392-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b71957.