Suppr超能文献

漏靶比误报更频繁:视觉搜索错误率模型。

Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.

作者信息

Zenger B, Fahle M

机构信息

Sektion Visuelle Sensorik, University Eye Clinic, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Dec;23(6):1783-91. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.6.1783.

Abstract

In many visual search tasks, reaction times (RTs) for target detection are measured as a function of display size. The corresponding error rates are usually low but increase with increasing display size. Missed-target errors are more common than false alarms. In recent models of visual search, the error rates were attributed to a premature search termination and error rates increasing with display size were interpreted as indicating a speed-accuracy trade-off and an underestimation of search times per item (obtained from RT slopes). A model is described in which errors occur as a result of imperfect rather than incomplete search (i.e., it is assumed that there are task-specific probabilities of categorizing a target or a distractor incorrectly). Signal-detection theory is used to show that the observed error rate properties can be attributed to an optimized decision strategy. "Corrections" of RT data are thus questionable.

摘要

在许多视觉搜索任务中,目标检测的反应时间(RTs)是作为显示大小的函数来测量的。相应的错误率通常较低,但会随着显示大小的增加而上升。漏检目标错误比误报更为常见。在最近的视觉搜索模型中,错误率被归因于过早的搜索终止,而随着显示大小增加的错误率被解释为表明速度与准确性之间的权衡,以及对每个项目搜索时间的低估(从反应时间斜率得出)。本文描述了一个模型,其中错误的发生是由于不完美而非不完整的搜索(即假设存在将目标或干扰项错误分类的特定任务概率)。信号检测理论被用于表明观察到的错误率特性可归因于一种优化的决策策略。因此,对反应时间数据的“校正”是值得怀疑的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验