Korczak J F, Goldstein A M
Genetic Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7360, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):827-32. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<827::AID-GEPI44>3.0.CO;2-P.
Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis was used to screen 367 highly polymorphic markers for evidence of linkage to a disease, defined either quantitatively (Q1) or dichotomously (AF). Five individual replicates, plus a case family data set containing all families in these replicates with at least one individual with AF, were analyzed. Sib-pair linkage results for Q1 and AF varied considerably among the five replicates and did not consistently detect any of the three underlying major loci, MG1, MG2, and MG3. For the pooled case families, linkage analyses of Q1, but not AF, detected the flanking markers for MG1 and MG2 at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. Overall, type 1 error rates were not elevated. The ability to analyze the disease quantitatively (Q1) and construct a data set more appropriate for linkage analysis (case families) enhanced the power to detect at least some of the major loci underlying the disease.
采用无模型同胞对连锁分析方法,对367个高度多态性标记进行筛查,以寻找与一种疾病的连锁证据,该疾病可定量定义(Q1)或二分定义(AF)。分析了五个独立重复样本,以及一个病例家系数据集,该数据集包含这些重复样本中所有至少有一名患有AF个体的家系。Q1和AF的同胞对连锁结果在五个重复样本中差异很大,并且没有一致地检测到三个潜在的主要基因座MG1、MG2和MG3中的任何一个。对于合并的病例家系,Q1的连锁分析(而非AF的连锁分析)分别在0.05和0.01水平检测到了MG1和MG2的侧翼标记。总体而言,I型错误率没有升高。对疾病进行定量分析(Q1)以及构建更适合连锁分析的数据集(病例家系)的能力,增强了检测该疾病至少一些主要基因座的能力。