• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A pilot study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in corrections: assessment of malingering, suicide risk, and aggression in male inmates.

作者信息

Wang E W, Rogers R, Giles C L, Diamond P M, Herrington-Wang L E, Taylor E R

机构信息

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock 79404, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 1997 Autumn;15(4):469-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199723/09)15:4<469::aid-bsl279>3.0.co;2-a.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199723/09)15:4<469::aid-bsl279>3.0.co;2-a
PMID:9433749
Abstract

Provision of mental health services to correctional populations places considerable demands on clinical staff to provide efficient and effective means to screen patients for severe mental disorders and other emergent conditions that necessitate immediate interventions. Among the highly problematic behaviors found in correctional settings are forms of acting out (e.g., suicide and aggression towards others) and response style (e.g., motivations to malinger). The current study examined the usefulness of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in assessing problematic behaviors in a corrections-based psychiatric hospital. As evidence of criterion related validity, selected PAI scales were compared to (a) evidence of malingering on the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS), (b) suicidal threats and gestures, and (c) ratings of aggression on the Overt Aggression Scale (OAS). In general, results supported the use of the PAI for the assessment of these problematic behaviors.

摘要

相似文献

1
A pilot study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in corrections: assessment of malingering, suicide risk, and aggression in male inmates.
Behav Sci Law. 1997 Autumn;15(4):469-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199723/09)15:4<469::aid-bsl279>3.0.co;2-a.
2
Convergent validity of the personality assessment inventory: A study of emergency referrals in a correctional setting.人格评估量表的收敛效度:一项针对惩教机构中紧急转诊情况的研究。
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500102.
3
Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.惩教机构中的诈病现象:在监狱样本中使用《报告症状结构化访谈》。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):753-65. doi: 10.1002/bsl.892.
4
Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory.使用人格评估量表对刑事司法样本中的诈病进行筛查。
Psychol Assess. 2006 Dec;18(4):415-23. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.415.
5
Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: a comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS.精神科病房及普通监狱服刑人员中诈病的检测:人格评估问卷(PAI)、症状自评量表(SIMS)及结构化访谈报告量表(SIRS)的比较
J Pers Assess. 2007 Feb;88(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/00223890709336832.
6
Personality assessment inventory (PAI) in forensic and correctional settings: A comprehensive review.人格评估量表(PAI)在法医和矫正环境中的应用:全面综述。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2024 Apr;103:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102661. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings.PAI与伪装:关于其在法医矫正环境中使用的警示说明。
Assessment. 1998 Dec;5(4):399-405. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500409.
8
The relationship between psychopathic personality features and malingering symptoms of major mental illness.精神病态人格特征与重度精神疾病诈病症状之间的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Dec;25(6):567-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1012702223004.
9
Validity of the Miller forensic assessment of symptoms test in psychiatric inpatients.米勒症状法医评估测试在精神科住院患者中的效度
Psychol Rep. 2005 Jun;96(3 Pt 1):771-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.3.771-774.
10
The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.使用多个 PAI 量表升高来检测装病:一个新指标。
Assessment. 2013 Aug;20(4):437-47. doi: 10.1177/1073191112458146. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Faking Bad in Workers Compensation Psychological Assessments: Elevation Rates of Negative Distortion Scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in an Australian Sample.工伤赔偿心理评估中的伪装不良:澳大利亚样本中《人格评估量表》负面失真量表的升高率
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Mar 8;24(5):682-693. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1291295. eCollection 2017.
2
A Laboratory Word Memory Test Analogue Differentiates Intentional Feigning from True Responding Using the P300 Event-Related Potential.一项实验室词语记忆测试模拟,利用P300事件相关电位区分故意伪装与真实反应。
Brain Sci. 2019 May 14;9(5):109. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050109.
3
Diagnostic efficiency of the personality assessment inventory LOGIT function for posttraumatic stress disorder in women.
人格评估量表LOGIT函数对女性创伤后应激障碍的诊断效能
J Pers Assess. 2009 Sep;91(5):409-15. doi: 10.1080/00223890903087497.
4
Schizopsychotic symptom-profiles and biomarkers: beacons in diagnostic labyrinths.分裂性精神病症状特征与生物标志物:诊断迷宫中的指引
Neurotox Res. 2008 Oct;14(2-3):79-96. doi: 10.1007/BF03033800.