• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prophylactic antiepileptic agents after head injury: a systematic review.头部损伤后的预防性抗癫痫药物:一项系统评价。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;64(1):108-12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.1.108.
2
Anti-epileptic drugs for preventing seizures following acute traumatic brain injury.用于预防急性创伤性脑损伤后癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD000173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000173.
3
WITHDRAWN: Antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures following acute traumatic brain injury.撤回:用于预防急性创伤性脑损伤后癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000173.pub2.
4
Anti-epileptic drugs for preventing seizures following acute traumatic brain injury.用于预防急性创伤性脑损伤后癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000173.
5
Antiepileptogenesis and seizure prevention trials with antiepileptic drugs: meta-analysis of controlled trials.抗癫痫药物的抗癫痫发生及癫痫预防试验:对照试验的荟萃分析
Epilepsia. 2001 Apr;42(4):515-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.28900.x.
6
Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children (Review).儿童热性惊厥的预防性药物管理(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1376-485. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1921.
7
Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children.儿童热性惊厥的预防性药物管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD003031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003031.pub2.
8
Early versus late antiepileptic drug withdrawal for people with epilepsy in remission.癫痫缓解期患者早期与晚期停用抗癫痫药物的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD001902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001902.
9
Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for post-craniotomy seizures.抗癫痫药物用于开颅术后癫痫发作的预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28(2):CD007286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007286.pub2.
10
Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Prophylaxis Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠用于创伤性脑损伤后癫痫预防的系统评价和Meta分析
CNS Drugs. 2016 Aug;30(8):677-88. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0365-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical management of contrast-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review.对比剂诱导性神经毒性的临床管理:系统评价。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2024 Aug;124(4):1141-1149. doi: 10.1007/s13760-024-02474-4. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
2
Association of Early Seizure Prophylaxis With Posttraumatic Seizures and Mortality: A Meta-analysis With Evidence Quality Assessment.早期癫痫预防与创伤后癫痫发作及死亡率的关联:一项带有证据质量评估的荟萃分析
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;13(3):e200145. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200145. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Geriatric Neurosurgery: A Review of 669 Neurosurgical Cases.老年神经外科中的抗癫痫药物:669例神经外科病例回顾
J Epilepsy Res. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):27-32. doi: 10.14581/jer.22005. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Prion-Like Propagation Mechanisms in Tauopathies and Traumatic Brain Injury: Challenges and Prospects.tau 病和创伤性脑损伤中的朊病毒样传播机制:挑战与展望。
Biomolecules. 2020 Oct 27;10(11):1487. doi: 10.3390/biom10111487.
5
Auricular Electroacupuncture for Late Posttraumatic Epilepsy after Severe Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study.耳针治疗重度脑损伤后晚期创伤后癫痫:一项回顾性研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Oct 13;2019:5798912. doi: 10.1155/2019/5798912. eCollection 2019.
6
Prevention of brain damage after traumatic brain injury by pharmacological enhancement of KCNQ (Kv7, "M-type") K currents in neurons.通过药物增强神经元中的 KCNQ(Kv7,“M 型”)K 电流预防创伤性脑损伤后的脑损伤。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Jun;40(6):1256-1273. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19857818. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
Glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose prevents cortical hyperexcitability after traumatic brain injury.糖酵解抑制剂 2-脱氧葡萄糖可预防创伤性脑损伤后的皮质过度兴奋。
JCI Insight. 2019 Apr 30;5(11):126506. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126506.
8
Surgical Outcomes in Post-Traumatic Epilepsy: A Single Institutional Experience.创伤后癫痫的手术治疗结果:单中心经验
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Jan 1;18(1):12-18. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz043.
9
The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map.颅脑创伤急性期中重度管理的系统评价的货币、完整性和质量:全面证据图谱。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198676. eCollection 2018.
10
Antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients.重症患者的抗癫痫药物。
Crit Care. 2018 Jun 7;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2066-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenytoin pretreatment prevents hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in neonatal rats.苯妥英钠预处理可预防新生大鼠缺氧缺血性脑损伤。
Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1996 Sep 2;95(2):169-75. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(96)00073-9.
2
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?评估随机临床试验报告的质量:设盲是否必要?
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
3
Survey of critical care management of comatose, head-injured patients in the United States.美国昏迷头部受伤患者的重症监护管理调查。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Mar;23(3):560-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199503000-00023.
4
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect.需治疗人数:一种临床实用的治疗效果衡量指标。
BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):452-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452.
5
Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.为何应探究荟萃分析中的异质性来源。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1351-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1351.
6
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.偏倚的实证证据。与对照试验中治疗效果估计相关的方法学质量维度。
JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408.
7
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.为系统评价识别相关研究。
BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286.
8
Failure of prophylactically administered phenytoin to prevent late posttraumatic seizures.预防性使用苯妥英未能预防创伤后晚期癫痫发作。
J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):236-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0236.
9
Failure of prophylactically administered phenytoin to prevent early posttraumatic seizures.预防性使用苯妥英未能预防创伤后早期癫痫发作。
J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):231-5. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0231.
10
Prophylactic treatment of posttraumatic epilepsy: results of a long-term follow-up in Czechoslovakia.创伤后癫痫的预防性治疗:捷克斯洛伐克长期随访结果
Epilepsia. 1981 Jun;22(3):315-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb04115.x.

头部损伤后的预防性抗癫痫药物:一项系统评价。

Prophylactic antiepileptic agents after head injury: a systematic review.

作者信息

Schierhout G, Roberts I

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;64(1):108-12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.1.108.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp.64.1.108
PMID:9436738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2169898/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic antiepileptic agents in the management of acute traumatic head injury.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Dewent Biotechnology abstracts, and specialised databases of randomised controlled trials, by searching reference lists and contacting investigators.

RESULTS

Ten eligible randomised controlled trials were identified, including 2036 patients. The pooled relative risk (RR) for early seizure prevention was 0.34 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.21-0.54); based on this estimate, for every 100 patients treated, 10 would be kept seizure free in the first week. Seizure control in the acute phase was not accompanied by a reduction in mortality (RR=1.15; 95% CI 0.89-1.51), a reduction in death and neurological disability (RR=1.49; 95% CI 1.06-2.08 for carbamazepine and RR=0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.26 for phenytoin) or a reduction in late seizures (pooled RR=1.28; 95% CI 0.90-1.81). The pooled relative risk for skin rashes was 1.57 (95% CI 0.90-2.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs are effective in reducing early seizures, but there is no evidence that treatment with such drugs reduces the occurrence of late seizures, or has any effect on death and neurological disability. Insufficient evidence is available to establish the net benefit of prophylactic treatment at any time after injury.

摘要

目的

确定预防性抗癫痫药物在急性创伤性脑损伤治疗中的有效性和安全性。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、德温特生物技术文摘以及随机对照试验的专业数据库,并查阅参考文献列表和联系研究者,对随机对照试验进行系统评价。

结果

共纳入10项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及2036例患者。预防早期癫痫发作的合并相对危险度(RR)为0.34(95%置信区间(95%CI)0.21 - 0.54);据此估计,每治疗100例患者,在第一周可使10例患者无癫痫发作。急性期癫痫控制并未使死亡率降低(RR = 1.15;95%CI 0.89 - 1.51),也未使死亡和神经功能障碍减少(卡马西平的RR = 1.49;95%CI 1.06 - 2.08,苯妥英钠的RR = 0.96;95%CI 0.72 - 1.26),或晚期癫痫发作减少(合并RR = 1.28;95%CI 0.90 - 1.81)。皮疹的合并相对危险度为1.57(95%CI 0.90 - 2.75)。

结论

预防性抗癫痫药物在减少早期癫痫发作方面有效,但没有证据表明此类药物治疗可降低晚期癫痫发作的发生率,或对死亡和神经功能障碍有任何影响。尚无足够证据确定伤后任何时间预防性治疗的净效益。