Suppr超能文献

针对艾滋病病毒的预先指示。

The HIV-specific advance directive.

作者信息

Singer P A, Thiel E C, Salit I, Flanagan W, Naylor C D

机构信息

University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):729-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07157.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether persons living with HIV find a disease-specific advance directive more acceptable than a generic directive.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

HIV consumer organization and hospital-based HIV clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteer sample of persons with HIV.

INTERVENTIONS

The disease-specific HIV Living Will, the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will, or both.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 101 participants who received both advance directives, 78 (77.2%) preferred the disease-specific HIV Living Will and 23 (22.8%) preferred the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will (p < .001). Most participants who preferred the HIV Living Will did so because it was more specific or relevant to their situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons living with HIV prefer a disease-specific to a generic advance directive. They should be offered a disease-specific advance directive. Our findings should also encourage investigators to develop and evaluate disease-specific advance directives in other clinical settings.

摘要

目的

确定感染艾滋病毒的人是否认为特定疾病的预先指示比通用指示更容易接受。

设计

随机临床试验。

地点

艾滋病毒消费者组织和医院的艾滋病毒诊所。

参与者

艾滋病毒感染者志愿者样本。

干预措施

特定疾病的《艾滋病毒生前遗嘱》、通用的生物伦理中心《生前遗嘱》或两者皆有。

测量和主要结果

在101名同时收到两种预先指示的参与者中,78人(77.2%)更喜欢特定疾病的《艾滋病毒生前遗嘱》,23人(22.8%)更喜欢通用的生物伦理中心《生前遗嘱》(p <.001)。大多数更喜欢《艾滋病毒生前遗嘱》的参与者这样做是因为它更具体或与他们自身情况更相关。

结论

感染艾滋病毒的人更喜欢特定疾病的预先指示而非通用预先指示。应该为他们提供特定疾病的预先指示。我们的研究结果也应鼓励研究人员在其他临床环境中开发和评估特定疾病的预先指示。

相似文献

1
The HIV-specific advance directive.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):729-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07157.x.
2
The cancer specific advance directive.
Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1570-7.
4
Physicians's reports on the impact of living wills at the end of life in Japan.
J Med Ethics. 2003 Aug;29(4):248-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.4.248.
6
Patients' understanding of advance directives and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
J Crit Care. 2005 Mar;20(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.11.002.
7
End-of-life decisions in HIV-positive patients: the role of spiritual beliefs.
AIDS. 1998 Jan 1;12(1):103-7. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199801000-00012.
8
End-of-life discussions and preferences among persons with HIV.
JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2880-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.22.2880.
9
Betting your life: an argument against certain advance directives.
J Med Ethics. 1996 Apr;22(2):95-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.2.95.

引用本文的文献

2
Communication Tools for End-of-Life Decision-Making in Ambulatory Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0150671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150671. eCollection 2016.
3
A theoretical decision model to help inform advance directive discussions for patients with COPD.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Dec 20;10:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-75.
4
Development of an interactive computer program for advance care planning.
Health Expect. 2009 Mar;12(1):60-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00517.x. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
5
Professional education in end-of-life care: a US perspective.
J R Soc Med. 2001 Sep;94(9):472-6; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400916.
6
Living wills can help doctors and patients talk about dying.
West J Med. 2000 Dec;173(6):368-9. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.6.368.
7
How living wills can help doctors and patients talk about dying.
BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1618-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1618.
8
End-of-life care in HIV disease: let's talk.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):784-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07166.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patient's perspective.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Apr 27;158(8):879-84. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.8.879.
4
Advance directives: what have we learned so far?
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Spring;4(1):8-16.
6
Advance directives. Effect of type of directive on physicians' therapeutic decisions.
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Feb 8;153(3):375-81. doi: 10.1001/archinte.153.3.375.
7
Public opinion regarding consent to treatment.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Feb;41(2):112-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb02042.x.
8
Which advance directive do patients prefer?
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Jan;9(1):49-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02599143.
9
Disease-specific advance directives.
Lancet. 1994 Aug 27;344(8922):594-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91971-2.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验