• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症特定预先指示。

The cancer specific advance directive.

作者信息

Berry S R, Singer P A

机构信息

University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, and Department of Medical Oncology, Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1570-7.

PMID:9554536
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance directives are an important part of end of life care, but current advance directive documents do not address the specific issues facing cancer patients. The authors' purpose was: 1) to develop a cancer specific advance directive, 2) determine whether oncology outpatients find this directive more acceptable than a generic advance directive, and 3) describe oncology outpatient preferences for life-sustaining treatment.

METHODS

A cancer specific advance directive ("The Cancer Living Will"; the full text of the updated version is available at the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics website [URL: www.utoronto.ca/jcb]) was developed in four steps: 1) literature search, 2) key informant interviews, 3) focus groups, and 4) evaluation of face and content validity. Subsequently, 91 volunteer oncology patients were given copies of the cancer specific advance directive and the generic advance directive ("The University of Toronto Centre for Bioethics Living Will") from which it was adapted. Acceptability of the advance directive was measured by determining the participants' preferred directive. Participants recorded their treatment preferences in both the cancer specific and generic advance directives.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients who returned their questionnaires, 50 expressed a preference for the advance directive. Thirty-two patients (64%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 49-77%) preferred the disease specific Cancer Living Will and 18 patients (36%; 95% CI, 23-51%) preferred the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will. Most participants who preferred the Cancer Living Will did so because it was more specific and relevant to their situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have developed and evaluated a cancer specific advance directive that they believe can be recommended for clinical use with cancer patients.

摘要

背景

预立医疗指示是临终关怀的重要组成部分,但目前的预立医疗指示文件并未涉及癌症患者面临的具体问题。作者的目的是:1)制定一份针对癌症的预立医疗指示;2)确定肿瘤门诊患者是否认为这份指示比通用的预立医疗指示更易接受;3)描述肿瘤门诊患者对维持生命治疗的偏好。

方法

通过四个步骤制定了一份针对癌症的预立医疗指示(“癌症生前遗嘱”;更新版本的全文可在多伦多大学联合生物伦理中心网站获取[网址:www.utoronto.ca/jcb]):1)文献检索;2)关键信息提供者访谈;3)焦点小组讨论;4)表面效度和内容效度评估。随后,向91名自愿参与的肿瘤患者提供了这份针对癌症的预立医疗指示以及改编自它的通用预立医疗指示(“多伦多大学联合生物伦理中心生前遗嘱”)。通过确定参与者偏好的指示来衡量预立医疗指示的可接受性。参与者在针对癌症的预立医疗指示和通用预立医疗指示中都记录了他们的治疗偏好。

结果

在60名返回问卷的患者中,50名表达了对预立医疗指示的偏好。32名患者(64%;95%置信区间[CI],49 - 77%)更喜欢针对特定疾病的“癌症生前遗嘱”,18名患者(36%;95%CI,23 - 51%)更喜欢通用的“联合生物伦理中心生前遗嘱”。大多数更喜欢“癌症生前遗嘱”的参与者这样做是因为它更具体且与他们的情况更相关。

结论

作者制定并评估了一份针对癌症的预立医疗指示,他们认为该指示可推荐用于癌症患者的临床实践。

相似文献

1
The cancer specific advance directive.癌症特定预先指示。
Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1570-7.
2
Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.加拿大门诊患者与预立医疗指示:知识匮乏、经验欠缺但态度积极。
CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497-502.
3
Life-sustaining treatment preferences of hemodialysis patients: implications for advance directives.血液透析患者维持生命治疗的偏好:对预先指示的影响
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995 Nov;6(5):1410-7. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V651410.
4
The oncology nurse's role in patient advance directives.肿瘤护理人员在患者预立医疗指示中的角色。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jul;19(6):891-6.
5
The HIV-specific advance directive.针对艾滋病病毒的预先指示。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):729-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07157.x.
6
Attitudes towards and barriers to writing advance directives amongst cancer patients, healthy controls, and medical staff.癌症患者、健康对照者及医务人员对预先医疗指示的态度和书写障碍。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):437-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009605.
7
An electronic medical record intervention increased nursing home advance directive orders and documentation.一项电子病历干预措施增加了疗养院预先医疗指示的医嘱和文件记录。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1001-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01214.x.
8
[Ethical issues in the practice of advance directives, living wills, and self-determination in end of life care].[临终关怀中预立医疗指示、生前遗嘱及自我决定权实施中的伦理问题]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2009 Feb;56(1):17-22.
9
Advance directives and the cost of terminal hospitalization.预立医疗指示与晚期住院费用。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 26;154(18):2077-83.
10
Determining the relationship between end-of-life decisions expressed in advance directives and resuscitation efforts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.确定预先指令中表达的临终决定与心肺复苏期间的复苏努力之间的关系。
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2001 Apr-Jun;5(2):87-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an advance directive 'communication tool' relevant for patients with advanced cancer in six European countries: Experiences from the ACTION trial.在六个欧洲国家为晚期癌症患者开发预先指示“沟通工具”:ACTION 试验的经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271919. eCollection 2022.
2
2021 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Management of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.2021 年美国甲状腺协会甲状腺间变性癌患者管理指南。
Thyroid. 2021 Mar;31(3):337-386. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0944.
3
Understanding how cancer patients actualise, relinquish, and reject advance care planning: implications for practice.
理解癌症患者如何实现、放弃和拒绝预先医疗护理计划:对实践的启示。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Aug;21(8):2195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1779-6. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
4
What influences individuals to engage in advance care planning?是什么影响个人参与预先护理计划?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Aug;27(5):306-12. doi: 10.1177/1049909109355280. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
5
The health care information directive.医疗保健信息指令。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-1. Epub 2001 Apr 25.