Masuda Y, Fetters M D, Hattori A, Mogi N, Naito M, Iguchi A, Uemura K
Department of Geriatrics, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
J Med Ethics. 2003 Aug;29(4):248-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.4.248.
A growing number of Japanese people have completed advance directives, especially living wills, even though there is no legislation recognising such documents and little empirical research on their impact on clinical care at the end of life in Japan.
To investigate physicians' attitudes about living wills and their experiences with patients who had completed a living will and later died.
Self administered survey and qualitative study using open question and content analysis.
Japan.
Physicians known to have cared for a patient who had presented a living will prior to death.
The physician's response to receiving a living will, communication about the living will, the impact of the living will on clinical care, demographics, and their opinion on advance directives, especially living wills.
Fifty five per cent of respondents approved of advance directives in general, and 34% had more opportunities to communicate with a patient and his/her family after receiving the living will. Sixty nine per cent of the physicians who received a living will did not, however, change their course of therapy as a consequence of receiving the living wills. Based on the analysis, we identified three areas of concern in the comments on living wills: (1) concerns relative to patients, physicians, and families; (2) social context, and (3) clinical and administrative concerns. The physicians raised various topics for discussion; they tended to describe the issues from a clinical perspective.
Our identified areas of concern should prove helpful in better understanding the clinical and ethical implications of living wills in Japan.
尽管日本没有立法认可生前预嘱这类文件,且关于其对临终临床护理影响的实证研究很少,但完成生前预嘱(尤其是生存意愿书)的日本人越来越多。
调查医生对生存意愿书的态度以及他们对已完成生存意愿书并随后去世患者的诊治经历。
采用开放式问题和内容分析法进行的自我管理调查和定性研究。
日本。
已知曾照料过在去世前出示过生存意愿书患者的医生。
医生收到生存意愿书后的反应、关于生存意愿书的沟通情况、生存意愿书对临床护理的影响、人口统计学信息以及他们对生前预嘱(尤其是生存意愿书)的看法。
总体而言,55%的受访者赞成生前预嘱,34%的受访者在收到生存意愿书后有更多机会与患者及其家属沟通。然而,69%收到生存意愿书的医生并未因收到生存意愿书而改变治疗方案。基于分析,我们在关于生存意愿书的评论中确定了三个关注点:(1)与患者、医生和家属相关的问题;(2)社会背景;(3)临床和管理方面的问题。医生们提出了各种讨论话题;他们倾向于从临床角度描述这些问题。
我们确定的关注点应有助于更好地理解日本生存意愿书的临床和伦理意义。