El-Naggar M, Sadagopan S, Levine H, Kantor H, Collins V J
Anesth Analg. 1976 Mar-Apr;55(2):195-201. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197603000-00015.
One of the problems of prolonged ventilatory therapy in acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the need to choose between tracheostomy after 48 to 72 hours of translaryngeal (TL) tracheal intubation or the continuous use of the TL tube for a period of 10 days. Too often the choice has been based on retrospective studies or personal preference. To investigate this problem prospectively, 52 adults in ARF were divided sequentially into 2 groups on their 3rd day of TL intubation. Patients in group I (G-I) retained the TL tube for a total of 11 days; those in group II (G-II) were tracheostomized on the 3rd day. The following factors ere used to evaluate the efficiency and complications in each group: patient's epidemiologic variables, daily pulmonary functions, severity of respiratory infections, and scores of post-intubation airway lesions. No consistent statistically significant differences between the two procedures were seen in the pulmonary functions or the range of individual patient variables. However, with an early tracheostomy, there was an eightfold greater incidence of contamination of the airway by new organisms, airway lesions were more frequent and severe, and the need for the tracheal tube was extended. To identify the epidemiologic variables and the pulmonary functions that discriminate between patients with serious airway lesions and those with mild lesions, and to evaluate the ability of these variables to differentiate the patients who died from those who survived, the distribution of all factors was compared in the two categories. The epidemiologic variables separated the patients according to their airway lesions only, while the difference in pulmonary functions was statistically significant only between the patients who died and those who survived.
急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者进行长时间通气治疗时面临的一个问题是,在经喉(TL)气管插管48至72小时后是否行气管切开术,还是持续使用TL管10天。通常,这种选择是基于回顾性研究或个人偏好。为了前瞻性地研究这个问题,52例ARF成年患者在TL插管第3天被依次分为两组。第一组(G-I)患者保留TL管共11天;第二组(G-II)患者在第3天行气管切开术。以下因素用于评估每组的疗效和并发症:患者的流行病学变量、每日肺功能、呼吸道感染的严重程度以及插管后气道损伤评分。两组在肺功能或个体患者变量范围方面未发现一致的统计学显著差异。然而,早期气管切开术会使新病原体导致气道污染的发生率增加8倍,气道损伤更频繁、更严重,且气管插管需求时间延长。为了确定能区分严重气道损伤患者和轻度损伤患者的流行病学变量和肺功能,并评估这些变量区分死亡患者和存活患者的能力,对两类患者的所有因素分布进行了比较。流行病学变量仅根据气道损伤对患者进行了区分,而肺功能差异仅在死亡患者和存活患者之间具有统计学意义。