Schnier M, Eckstein F, Priebsch J, Haubner M, Sittek H, Becker C, Putz R, Englmeier K H, Reiser M
Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum Grosshadern, München.
Rofo. 1997 Nov;167(5):521-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015574.
In the present study we intended to validate knee joint cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MRI.
Ten fresh cadaver knees (age 29 to 64 yrs.) were sagittally imaged, using a fat-suppressed FLASH-3D sequence with a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. Then, a contrast agent was injected and the specimens submitted to CT arthrography. From both modalities the patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilages were segmented semiautomatically and reconstructed three-dimensionally. The cartilage thickness was determined independently of the sectional plane, based on a "minimal distance algorithm".
The volumes and the regional distribution patterns yielded a very high degree of similarity on direct comparison of both imaging modalities. The average volume error between MRI and CT was 3.8% (+/- 3.0%), the correlation 0.998, the slope of the regression line 1.04 and the gamma-intercept -80 mm3. The analysis yielded no significant differences between the two methods (Wilcoxon signed rank test, 5% level) in the patella, femur, medial, and lateral tibia.
The results suggest that, based on a fat-suppressed FLASH sequence with high resolution and three-dimensional concepts of digital image analysis, the cartilage volume and thickness can be analysed non-invasively and with high accuracy by MRI.
在本研究中,我们旨在验证利用磁共振成像(MRI)测量膝关节软骨体积和厚度的方法。
对10个新鲜尸体膝关节(年龄29至64岁)进行矢状面成像,采用脂肪抑制快速低角度激发三维(FLASH-3D)序列,分辨率为2×0.31×0.31立方毫米。然后,注入造影剂并对标本进行CT关节造影。从这两种成像方式中,半自动分割髌软骨、股骨软骨和胫骨软骨,并进行三维重建。基于“最小距离算法”,独立于截面平面确定软骨厚度。
在直接比较两种成像方式时,体积和区域分布模式具有高度相似性。MRI和CT之间的平均体积误差为3.8%(±3.0%),相关性为0.998,回归线斜率为1.04,γ截距为-80立方毫米。在髌骨、股骨、胫骨内侧和外侧,两种方法之间的分析未产生显著差异(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,5%水平)。
结果表明,基于具有高分辨率的脂肪抑制FLASH序列和数字图像分析的三维概念,MRI能够无创且高精度地分析软骨体积和厚度。