Vecchi A, Mantovani A, Tagliabue A, Spreafico F
Cancer Res. 1976 Apr;36(4):1222-7.
The effects of adriamycin (AM) and its analog daunomycin (DM) on immunological responsiveness have been investigated in an effort to elucidate whether a differential interaction of the two drugs with the immune system could play a role in the higher antineoplastic activity of AM. It was found that AM induced a greater reduction in the number of antibody-producing cells after primary stimulation with sheep erythrocytes, whereas DM was more suppressive on the secondary response to the same antigen. Primary reactivity to the T-independent antigen S-III was reduced by AM, whereas DM was ineffective in the same conditions even at high doses. In addition, when a tumor allograft model was investigated, DM was significantly more immunosuppressive than was AM administered at equitoxic doses. In contrast, these agents displayed similar activity in reducing bone marrow stem cells and in inhibiting DNA synthesis in this organ. The possibility that the different immunosuppressive capacity of AM and DM contributes to the greater antitumoral activity of the former is advanced.
已经研究了阿霉素(AM)及其类似物柔红霉素(DM)对免疫反应性的影响,以阐明这两种药物与免疫系统的差异相互作用是否可能在AM更高的抗肿瘤活性中发挥作用。结果发现,在用绵羊红细胞进行初次刺激后,AM诱导产生抗体的细胞数量减少得更多,而DM对同一抗原的二次反应抑制作用更强。AM降低了对非T细胞依赖性抗原S-III的初次反应性,而在相同条件下,即使高剂量的DM也没有效果。此外,当研究肿瘤同种异体移植模型时,在同等毒性剂量下,DM的免疫抑制作用明显强于AM。相比之下,这些药物在减少骨髓干细胞和抑制该器官中的DNA合成方面表现出相似的活性。AM和DM不同的免疫抑制能力导致前者具有更强抗肿瘤活性的可能性被提出。