Adam P, Stiffman M, Blake R L
Riverside University Family Practice Clinic, University of Minnesota Department of Family Practice and Community Health, Minneapolis 55406, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;7(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.1.39.
To determine whether hypertonic saline nasal spray relieves nasal symptoms and shortens illness duration in patients with the common cold or acute rhinosinusitis.
Randomized trial with 2 control groups.
Two family practice clinics.
One hundred forty-three adult patients with a cold or sinus infection. Patients with allergic rhinitis, symptoms for more than 3 weeks, or other respiratory diagnoses were excluded, as were those who had used topical decongestants.
Hypertonic saline or normal saline spray 3 times a day or observation. Subjects completed a 7-day symptom checklist that included a well-being question ("Do you feel back to normal?").
Nasal symptom score (sum of scores for nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and headache) on day 3 and day of well-being (day of symptom resolution).
Data were collected for 119 subjects. No difference was found in either primary outcome when hypertonic saline was compared with either normal saline or observation. Mean day of well-being was 8.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-9.7), 9.2 (95% CI, 6.9-11.43), and 8.0 (95% CI, 6.7-9.3) days in the hypertonic saline, normal saline, and observation groups, respectively. Day 3 mean nasal symptom score was 3.8 (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) for hypertonic saline, 3.7 (95% CI, 2.9-4.5) for normal saline, and 4.1 (95% CI, 3.5-4.7) for observation. Only 44% of the patients would use the hypertonic saline spray again. Thirty-two percent noted burning, compared with 13% of the normal saline group (P = .05).
Hypertonic saline does not improve nasal symptoms or illness duration in patients with the common cold or rhinosinusitis.
确定高渗盐水鼻喷雾剂能否缓解普通感冒或急性鼻窦炎患者的鼻部症状并缩短病程。
设有两个对照组的随机试验。
两家家庭医疗诊所。
143例患有感冒或鼻窦感染的成年患者。排除患有过敏性鼻炎、症状持续超过3周或有其他呼吸道诊断的患者,以及使用过局部减充血剂的患者。
高渗盐水或生理盐水喷雾,每日3次,或进行观察。受试者完成一份为期7天的症状清单,其中包括一个关于健康状况的问题(“你感觉恢复正常了吗?”)。
第3天和恢复正常日(症状缓解日)的鼻部症状评分(鼻塞、流涕和头痛评分之和)。
收集了119名受试者的数据。将高渗盐水与生理盐水或观察进行比较时,在两个主要结局指标上均未发现差异。高渗盐水组、生理盐水组和观察组恢复正常的平均天数分别为8.3天(95%置信区间[CI],6.9 - 9.7)、9.2天(95%CI,6.9 - 11.43)和8.0天(95%CI,6.7 - 9.3)。第3天高渗盐水组的平均鼻部症状评分为3.8(95%CI,3.0 - 4.5),生理盐水组为3.7(95%CI,2.9 - 4.5),观察组为4.1(95%CI,3.5 - 4.7)。只有44%的患者会再次使用高渗盐水喷雾。32%的患者指出有烧灼感,而生理盐水组为13%(P = 0.05)。
高渗盐水不能改善普通感冒或鼻窦炎患者的鼻部症状或病程。