Suppr超能文献

死海盐水冲洗与鼻腔类固醇盐水冲洗治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的症状:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究。

Dead Sea salt irrigations vs saline irrigations with nasal steroids for symptomatic treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, prospective double-blind study.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 30 N. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60602, USA.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 May-Jun;2(3):252-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21003. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intranasal steroids are 1 of the most frequently prescribed medications for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and saline irrigations are commonly used as an adjunct to medical therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of Dead Sea salt (DSS) irrigations and DSS nasal spray vs saline irrigations and topical nasal steroid spray in the treatment of symptoms of CRS.

METHODS

A total of 145 symptomatic adult patients without acute infection were initially enrolled and 114 completed the study. Patients completed a Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test 20 (SNOT-20) survey (primary outcome metric) and underwent endonasal examination, acoustic rhinometry, and smell testing (secondary outcome metrics). Patients were randomized to 2 groups. The experimental group (n = 59) self-administered hypertonic DSS spray and DSS irrigation; the control group (n = 55) self-administered fluticasone spray and hypertonic saline irrigation and spray. Patients and staff were blinded to group assignment. Outcomes were reassessed at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were homogeneous with respect to pretreatment primary and secondary outcome metrics. Dropout rates were 30% in the DSS group and 36.6% in the control group. Both groups showed significant improvement in mean SNOT-20 scores following treatment; however, the degree of improvement was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.082). There were no significant changes in secondary outcome metrics between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

For patients with CRS, treatment with DSS irrigations and sprays appears as effective for symptom reduction as a combination of hypertonic saline irrigations and sprays and a topical steroid spray.

摘要

背景

鼻内用类固醇是治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)最常开的药物之一,盐水冲洗通常作为药物治疗的辅助手段。我们旨在比较死海盐水(DSS)冲洗和 DSS 鼻腔喷雾与盐水冲洗和局部鼻用类固醇喷雾在治疗 CRS 症状方面的疗效。

方法

最初共招募了 145 名有症状的成年患者(无急性感染),其中 114 名患者完成了研究。患者完成了鼻-鼻窦结局测试 20 项(SNOT-20)调查(主要结局指标),并进行了鼻内检查、声反射测量和嗅觉测试(次要结局指标)。患者被随机分为 2 组。实验组(n = 59)自行使用高渗 DSS 喷雾和 DSS 冲洗;对照组(n = 55)自行使用糠酸氟替卡松喷雾和高渗盐水冲洗和喷雾。患者和工作人员对分组均不知情。在 4 周时重新评估结果。

结果

两组在治疗前的主要和次要结局指标上具有同质性。DSS 组的失访率为 30%,对照组为 36.6%。两组在治疗后 SNOT-20 评分的均值均有显著改善;但组间改善程度无显著差异(p = 0.082)。两组间次要结局指标无显著变化。

结论

对于 CRS 患者,DSS 冲洗和喷雾的治疗效果与高渗盐水冲洗和喷雾联合局部类固醇喷雾一样有效,可以减轻症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验