• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[职业病立法修订对评估椎间盘损伤的意义]

[Significance of revision of the occupational illness legislation for evaluating intervertebral disk damage].

作者信息

Weber M, Morgenthaler M

机构信息

Orthopädische Abteilung der Chirurgischen Universitätsklinik Freiburg.

出版信息

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Sep-Oct;135(5):386-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039406.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1039406
PMID:9446430
Abstract

QUESTION

Are there any radiological criterions which are able to indicate the profession related disease No. 2108?

METHODS

The medical documents and x-rays of the whole spine of 390 back pain patients who applied for a profession related disease of the spine were evaluated. Those patients who fulfilled the professional claims for acknowledgement of the profession related disease were compared to those who didn't fulfill these conditions.

RESULTS

Concerning the segmental alterations of the cervical and the lumbal spine specific allocation frequencies were found. The dominance of L3/4 in the comparison group was conspicuous. Looking at the allocation frequencies of the cervical and lumbal disc alterations in view of affection heaviness it was obvious, that the predominating slight alterations mainly were located in the central parts of the cervical and the lumbal spine whereas bad alterations mainly were found in the lower parts. Regarding this matter test and comparison groups behaved the same way. Looking at the allocation frequencies concerning single respectively multiple alterations it was found that in the comparison group single respectively bisegmentale alterations could be recognized even in duplicate than in the test group in which the multiple alterations were dominant. The comparison of the cervical and the lumbal spine regarding chondrotic? spondylotic, slight and bad alterations in all mentioned features the next deeper located segment was affected particularly in the test group. Therefore a distal shift of the chondrotic alterations could be recognized. In case of the spondylotic affections it was the other way round: a cranial shift was conspicuous.

CONCLUSION

After doing heavy labour for years only a few isolated multiple affections of the lumbal spine are found. On the strength of this fact the proof of exclusively in the lumbal spine located alterations doesn't allow the acknowledgement of a profession related disease. However, a distal shift of osteochondrotic alterations respectively a cranial shift of spondylotic affections in the lumbal spine is suspicous for being job-related. L3/4 takes a very special place in the differential diagnosis of profession related disease of the spine. In the test group this part of the lumbal spine showed bad alterations much more frequent. The affection of L3/4 pleads against a considerable participation of mechanical influences and therefore against a profession related disease. Singular or bisegmental disc affections are out of question for being a profession related disease because these alterations are seen much more frequent in the comparison than in the test group.

摘要

问题

是否存在能够指示职业相关疾病2108的放射学标准?

方法

对390名申请脊柱职业相关疾病的背痛患者的医学文件和全脊柱X光片进行评估。将符合职业相关疾病认定职业要求的患者与不符合这些条件的患者进行比较。

结果

发现了颈椎和腰椎节段性改变的特定分布频率。对照组中L3/4的优势明显。从颈椎和腰椎间盘改变的分布频率来看,考虑到病变严重程度,明显的是,主要的轻度改变主要位于颈椎和腰椎的中央部分,而严重改变主要出现在下部。在这方面,测试组和对照组表现相同。从单个或多个改变的分布频率来看,发现对照组中单个或双节段改变的发生率甚至是测试组的两倍,测试组中多个改变占主导。比较颈椎和腰椎在软骨性、骨性关节炎性、轻度和重度改变方面,在所有提到的特征中,测试组中位置更深的节段尤其受到影响。因此,可以识别出软骨性改变的远端移位。在骨性关节炎性病变的情况下则相反:明显的是近端移位。

结论

多年从事重体力劳动后,仅发现少数孤立的腰椎多处病变。基于这一事实,仅位于腰椎的改变证据不足以认定职业相关疾病。然而,腰椎中骨软骨性改变的远端移位或骨性关节炎性病变的近端移位可疑与工作相关。L3/4在脊柱职业相关疾病的鉴别诊断中占有非常特殊的地位。在测试组中,腰椎的这一部分显示严重改变的频率更高。L3/4的受累不利于机械影响的显著参与,因此也不利于职业相关疾病。单个或双节段椎间盘病变毫无疑问是职业相关疾病,因为这些改变在对照组中比在测试组中更常见。

相似文献

1
[Significance of revision of the occupational illness legislation for evaluating intervertebral disk damage].[职业病立法修订对评估椎间盘损伤的意义]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Sep-Oct;135(5):386-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039406.
2
[Is lumbar disk disease an occupational disease? Scientific background, radiological findings, and medical legal interpretations].[腰椎间盘疾病是职业病吗?科学背景、影像学发现及法医学解读]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002 Sep-Oct;140(5):512-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34003.
3
[Forensic expert relevance of imaging examinations in diagnosis of degenerative and occupational diseases of the lumbar spine].[影像学检查在腰椎退行性疾病和职业病诊断中的法医专家关联性]
Rontgenpraxis. 1995 Apr;48(4):104-6.
4
[Occupational disease 2108. Degenerative changes of the cervical spine as a causality criterion in the assessment of discogenic diseases according to BeKV 2108].
Unfallchirurg. 2003 Apr;106(4):306-12. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0561-x.
5
[Occupational accident insurance in intervertebral disk damage--new aspects of legal evaluation?].[椎间盘损伤中的职业事故保险——法律评估的新方面?]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1992 Jun 1;44(3):92-4.
6
[Significance of isthmic spondylolisthesis in expert assessment of occupational disease of the lumbar spine].[峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症在腰椎职业病专家评估中的意义]
Unfallchirurg. 1996 Jul;99(7):470-6.
7
[Occupational spinal diseases in employees of nursing services--epidemiological and legal insurance aspects (III). 3: Intervertebral disk-induced diseases of the lumbar spine in health care employees--expert assessment and prevention].[护理服务员工的职业性脊柱疾病——流行病学和法定保险方面(III)。3:医护人员腰椎间盘源性疾病——专家评估与预防]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1998 Apr 1;50(2):71-4.
8
[Pain and occupational disability].[疼痛与职业残疾]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Nov-Dec;141(6):606-15.
9
[Occupational diseases of the spine].[脊柱职业病]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002 Sep-Oct;140(5):518-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34006.
10
[Scheuermann disease as predisposition of later spinal disease and its effect on expert assessment in occupational disease examinations].[休曼病作为后期脊柱疾病的易患因素及其对职业病检查中专家评估的影响]
Versicherungsmedizin. 1996 Aug 1;48(4):126-8.