Krakauer D C, Payne R J
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Dec 22;264(1389):1757-62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0243.
Viruses from several different families are able to exploit their host's cell death programmes so as to maximize viral fitness. Consideration of the evolution of such strategies has lead to the suggestion that the virus should inhibit apoptosis, in order to prolong the life of the cell and thereby maximize the number of progeny virions. The host, on the other hand, should stimulate apoptosis thereby inhibiting viral growth and blocking viral spread. For example, the function of the latent membrane protein I (LMPI) of the Epstein-Barr virus and the bcl-2 homologue gene A179L of African swine fever virus is to inhibit apoptosis. However, in other cases it is the virus that stimulates cell death or the host that benefits from inhibiting apoptosis, such as in fatal alphavirus encephalitis. This has been explained by assuming that virus-induced apoptosis in non-regenerating cells would be detrimental to the host. We present a mathematical framework for understanding virus-induced apoptosis which accounts for these two opposite solutions to virus infection with respect to the mode of virus replication and the life cycle of the target cell.
来自几个不同家族的病毒能够利用其宿主的细胞死亡程序,以最大化病毒适应性。对这类策略进化的思考表明,病毒应该抑制细胞凋亡,以延长细胞寿命,从而使子代病毒粒子数量最大化。另一方面,宿主应该刺激细胞凋亡,从而抑制病毒生长并阻止病毒传播。例如,爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒的潜伏膜蛋白I(LMP1)和非洲猪瘟病毒的bcl-2同源基因A179L的功能是抑制细胞凋亡。然而,在其他情况下,是病毒刺激细胞死亡,或者宿主从抑制细胞凋亡中获益,比如在致命的甲病毒脑炎中。这可以通过假设病毒在非再生细胞中诱导的细胞凋亡对宿主有害来解释。我们提出了一个数学框架来理解病毒诱导的细胞凋亡,该框架考虑了病毒感染在病毒复制模式和靶细胞生命周期方面的这两种相反的应对方式。