• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气胸及其他气体泄漏与急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的关系。

The relation of pneumothorax and other air leaks to mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Weg J G, Anzueto A, Balk R A, Wiedemann H P, Pattishall E N, Schork M A, Wagner L A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):341-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380601.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199802053380601
PMID:9449726
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumothorax and other air leaks - any extrusion of air outside the tracheobronchial tree - have been attributed to high ventilatory pressures or volumes and linked to increased mortality.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a prospective trial of aerosolized synthetic surfactant in 725 patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis. We compared the ventilatory pressures and volumes in the patients without any air leaks (the highest values during the five-day study) with the pressures and volumes in those with pneumothorax or with any air leaks (the highest values during the 16- and 24-hour periods before the complication developed).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (6.9 percent) had pneumothorax and 77 (10.6 percent) had pneumothorax or other air leaks. There were no significant differences between patients with air leaks and those without air leaks in any pressure or volume examined. Overall mortality at 30 days was 40.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 36.4 to 43.6); among the patients with pneumothorax, it was 46.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 32.2 to 59.8), and among those without pneumothorax, it was 39.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 35.6 to 43.0; P=0.35). The mortality rate was 45.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 34.4 to 56.6) in the group with any air leaks and 39.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 35.3 to 42.8) in the group without air leaks (P=0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome who were receiving mechanical ventilation with conventional pressures and volumes, there were no significant correlations between high ventilatory pressures or volumes and the development of pneumothorax or other air leaks. Pneumothorax or other air leaks were not associated with a significantly increased mortality rate.

摘要

背景

在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,气胸及其他气体泄漏——气管支气管树外的任何气体挤出——被认为是由高通气压力或容量所致,并与死亡率增加相关。

方法

我们分析了一项针对725例脓毒症诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者进行雾化合成表面活性剂前瞻性试验的数据。我们将无任何气体泄漏患者(五天研究期间的最高值)的通气压力和容量与发生气胸或有任何气体泄漏患者(并发症出现前16至24小时期间的最高值)的压力和容量进行了比较。

结果

50例患者(6.9%)发生气胸,77例患者(10.6%)发生气胸或其他气体泄漏。在检查的任何压力或容量方面,有气体泄漏患者与无气体泄漏患者之间均无显著差异。30天的总体死亡率为40.0%(95%置信区间为36.4%至43.6%);气胸患者中的死亡率为46.0%(95%置信区间为32.2%至59.8%),无气胸患者中的死亡率为39.3%(95%置信区间为35.6%至43.0%;P = 0.35)。有任何气体泄漏组的死亡率为45.5%(95%置信区间为34.4%至56.6%),无气体泄漏组的死亡率为39.0%(95%置信区间为35.3%至42.8%)(P = 0.28)。

结论

在接受常规压力和容量机械通气的脓毒症诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,高通气压力或容量与气胸或其他气体泄漏的发生之间无显著相关性。气胸或其他气体泄漏与死亡率显著增加无关。

相似文献

1
The relation of pneumothorax and other air leaks to mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.气胸及其他气体泄漏与急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的关系。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):341-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380601.
2
Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group.评估一种预防急性呼吸窘迫综合征高危患者气压伤的通气策略。压力和容量限制通气策略组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):355-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380603.
3
Relationship between ventilatory settings and barotrauma in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中通气设置与气压伤的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Apr;28(4):406-13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1178-1. Epub 2002 Jan 15.
4
Aerosolized surfactant in adults with sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Exosurf Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Sepsis Study Group.雾化表面活性剂治疗成人脓毒症诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。外源性表面活性剂急性呼吸窘迫综合征脓毒症研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 May 30;334(22):1417-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605303342201.
5
A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial.高呼气末正压、低潮气量通气策略可改善持续性急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1311-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01.
6
Protective ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的保护性通气
N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):385-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380609.
7
Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced functional recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.呼气末正压通气诱导急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的功能复张。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):127-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b4a7e7.
8
Protective ventilation for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 16;339(3):196-7; author reply 198-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807163390311.
9
Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者较高与较低呼气末正压的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):327-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032193.
10
Low stretch ventilation strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome: eight years of clinical experience in a single center.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的低张通气策略:单中心八年临床经验
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):765-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000055402.68581.DC.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of pneumothorax on mortality, morbidity, and hospital resource utilization in COVID-19 patients: a propensity matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample database.气胸对新冠病毒肺炎患者死亡率、发病率及医院资源利用的影响:基于全国住院患者样本数据库的倾向匹配分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03161-z.
2
Ultraprotective Ventilation via ECCO2R in Three Patients Presenting an Air Leak: Is ECCO2R Effective?三名出现气胸的患者通过体外二氧化碳清除(ECCO2R)进行超保护性通气:ECCO2R 是否有效?
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 29;13(7):1081. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071081.
3
Ventilator management and risk of air leak syndrome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a single-center, retrospective, observational study.
SARS-CoV-2 肺炎患者呼吸机管理与空气泄漏综合征风险:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02549-7.
4
Time dependency and unique etiology of barotrauma in COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study with landmark analysis and pathological approach.COVID-19 中耳气压伤的时间依赖性和独特病因:基于时间节点分析和病理学方法的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282868. eCollection 2023.
5
Barotrauma in COVID 19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and effect on prognosis.新型冠状病毒肺炎中的气压伤:发生率、病理生理学及对预后的影响。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Oct;90:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Complications of invasive mechanical ventilation in critically Ill Covid-19 patients - A narrative review.危重症新冠肺炎患者有创机械通气的并发症——一项叙述性综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug;80:104201. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104201. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Barotrauma and its complications in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study at tertiary care hospital of Eastern India.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的气压伤及其并发症:印度东部三级医院的一项回顾性研究
Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022;46(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00880-3. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Clinical Profile of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Developing Pulmonary Barotrauma on Mechanical Ventilation.感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2并在机械通气时发生肺气压伤患者的临床特征
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 May;26(5):613-618. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24149.
9
Clinical impact of pneumothorax in patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and respiratory failure in an HIV-negative cohort.HIV 阴性人群中卡氏肺孢子菌肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患者气胸的临床影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01812-z.
10
Design and simulation of mechanical ventilators.机械通气机的设计与仿真
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2021 Sep;150:111169. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111169. Epub 2021 Jun 25.