Fujiwara S, Nakasato N, Nagamine Y, Yoshimoto T, Suematsu K, Takeda R, Takahashi S, Oda E, Ohashi Y
Kohnan Hospital (Tohoku Ryogo Center), Neurosurgery.
No To Shinkei. 1997 Dec;49(12):1139-45.
We developed a new rating scale, Kohnan Vegetative Score, to measure severity and small clinical changes in vegetative state patients. It has 7 items corresponding to the conditions of vegetative state by Japanese Society of Neurosurgery: motor function, food ingestion, urination and defecation, eye movement, vocalization, communication, and facial expression. Each item is rated in 5 ordinal categories: slight (score = 1), mild(2), moderate(4), and extreme(5). The sum of the scores is used as the summary score, which ranges from 7 to 35, and high score means 'severe'. We examined the reliability and the factorial structure of the Kohnan Vegetative Score. The subjects were 10 patients who met the conditions of vegetative state. Four neurosurgeons rated the subjects, and then 2 of them repeated the rating after one week interval. As a measure of reliability, the (weighted) Kappa coefficient proposed Cohen (1960, 1968) was calculated for each item, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the summary score. To analyze the factorial structure, the factor analysis was carried out. The minimum and the maximum weighted Kappa values were 0.44 and 0.64 for intra-rater reliability, and 0.37 and 0.69 for inter-rater reliability, respectively. Concerning the factorial structure, the contribution of the first factor was 91.5% which indicated the unidimensionality of the scale. The ICC's estimate for the summary score were 0.90 (95% C.I.: 0.766-0.970). On the basis of these results, the Kohnan Vegetative Score has unidimensionality and high reliability enough for a practical use.
我们开发了一种新的评分量表——小南植物状态评分量表,用于衡量植物状态患者的严重程度和微小的临床变化。它有7个项目,对应日本神经外科学会制定的植物状态状况:运动功能、食物摄入、排尿和排便、眼球运动、发声、交流以及面部表情。每个项目按5个顺序类别进行评分:轻微(得分 = 1)、轻度(2)、中度(4)和重度(5)。得分总和用作综合评分,范围为7至35分,高分表示“严重”。我们检验了小南植物状态评分量表的信度和因子结构。研究对象为10名符合植物状态条件的患者。4名神经外科医生对这些对象进行评分,然后其中2人在间隔一周后再次进行评分。作为信度的衡量指标,计算了每个项目的(加权)科恩(1960年、1968年)卡帕系数,并计算了综合评分的组内相关系数(ICC)。为了分析因子结构,进行了因子分析。评分者内信度的最小和最大加权卡帕值分别为0.44和0.64,评分者间信度的最小和最大加权卡帕值分别为0.37和0.69。关于因子结构,第一个因子的贡献率为91.5%,这表明该量表具有单维性。综合评分的ICC估计值为0.90(95%置信区间:0.766 - 0.970)。基于这些结果,小南植物状态评分量表具有单维性且信度足够高,可实际应用。