Suppr超能文献

[肌萎缩侧索硬化症评定量表的信度和因子结构]

[Reliability and factorial structure of a rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].

作者信息

Oda E, Ohashi Y, Tashiro K, Mizuno Y, Kowa H, Yanagisawa N

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

No To Shinkei. 1996 Nov;48(11):999-1007.

PMID:8951891
Abstract

The Modified Norris Scale is a rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which consists of two parts, the Limb Norris Scale and the Norris Bulbar Scale. The Limb Scale has 21 items to evaluate extremity function and the Bulbar Scale has 13 items to evaluate bulbar function. Each item is rated in 4 ordinal categories. Considering the habitual difference, we translated the English scale into Japanese one with minor modification, and added more detailed explanations for all categories of each item. Then we examined reliability and factorial structure of the translated scale. The subjects were 23 patients with motor disturbance and each subject was rated twice by 2-4 neurologists. As a measure of reliability, the Kappa coefficient proposed by Cohen (1960) and Kraemer (1980) was calculated for each item and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated for total scores of each of two scales. To analyze the factorial structure, the factor analysis was carried out. The minimum and the maximum Kappa values were .70 and .97 for intra-rater reliability of the Limb Scale's items, .60 and .83 for inter-rater reliability of the Limb Scale's items, .41 and 1.00 for intra-rater reliability of the Bulbar Scale's items and .26 and .81 for inter-rater reliability of the Bulbar Scale's items, respectively. Concerning the factorial structure, the contribution of the first factor was 83.6% for the Limb Scale and that for the Bulbar Scale was 66.7%. This indicates unidimensionality of both Scales. The ICCs for the total scores were .97 (95%C.I. .95-.99) for the Limb Scale and .86 (.73-.93) for the Bulbar Scale, respectively. On the basis of these results, the Scale has unidimensionality and high reliability enough for practical use.

摘要

改良诺里斯量表是一种用于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的评定量表,它由两部分组成,即肢体诺里斯量表和延髓诺里斯量表。肢体量表有21个项目用于评估肢体功能,延髓量表有13个项目用于评估延髓功能。每个项目按4个顺序类别进行评分。考虑到习惯差异,我们对英文量表进行了轻微修改后翻译成日文量表,并对每个项目的所有类别添加了更详细的解释。然后我们检验了翻译后量表的信度和因子结构。研究对象为23例运动障碍患者,每位患者由2至4名神经科医生进行两次评分。作为信度的一种度量,计算了科恩(1960年)和克雷默(1980年)提出的卡帕系数用于每个项目,并对两个量表各自的总分评估了组内相关系数(ICC)。为了分析因子结构,进行了因子分析。肢体量表项目的评分者内信度的最小和最大卡帕值分别为0.70和0.97,肢体量表项目的评分者间信度为0.60和0.83,延髓量表项目的评分者内信度为0.41和1.00,延髓量表项目的评分者间信度为0.26和0.81。关于因子结构,肢体量表第一个因子的贡献率为83.6%,延髓量表为66.7%。这表明两个量表均具有单维度性。肢体量表总分的ICC为0.97(95%置信区间0.95 - 0.99),延髓量表为0.86(0.73 - 0.93)。基于这些结果,该量表具有单维度性且信度高,足以用于实际应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验