Ordoñez J L, Domínguez J, Evrard V, Koninckx P R
Centre for Surgical Technologies, K.U. Leuven, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2654-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2654.
In order to evaluate the effect of training upon postoperative adhesions, standard bipolar and mechanical, nonopposing injuries were performed in the uterine horns and side walls of 52 mature female rabbits using a conventional three-puncture laparoscopy, by an endoscopic surgeon with limited experience. An additional injury, either bipolar or mechanical or both, was performed in the retro-uterine space. With experience, the duration of surgery decreased progressively from 12 +/- 2 to 8 +/- 1 min in the first and last 10 animals respectively. The amount of perioperative bleeding was not affected by experience. With experience the postoperative adhesions decreased in extent (P = 0.0001), tenacity (P = 0.004), type (P = 0.002) and inflammation (P = 0.003) and for total score (P = 0.0002). These changes were correlated with the briefer duration of surgery but not with the amount of perioperative bleeding. The strong correlations of adhesion scores in the pouch of Douglas, and around both uterine horns confirmed the importance of the inter-animal variability in making adhesions. By logistic regression, the adhesions in the pouch of Douglas were explained simultaneously by the adhesions on the uterine horns (P = 0.0004, thus correcting for inter-animal variability) by the amount of bleeding (P = 0.01) and the duration of surgery (P = 0.05). No major differences were found in adhesions following a mechanical or a bipolar injury or following such a lesion in the pouch of Douglas or at the uterine horns. In conclusion, experience, expressed by the duration of surgery and to a lesser extent perioperative bleeding, is a major co-factor in postoperative adhesions, suggesting that duration of surgery should be strictly standardized in endoscopic adhesion studies. The important inter-animal variability can be circumvented by using a standard control lesion, making each animal its own control.
为了评估训练对术后粘连的影响,由一位经验有限的内镜外科医生使用传统的三穿刺腹腔镜,在52只成年雌性兔的子宫角和侧壁进行标准的双极和机械性、非对合性损伤。在子宫后间隙进行额外的双极或机械性损伤,或两者皆有。随着经验的积累,手术时间在最初和最后的10只动物中分别从12±2分钟逐渐减少至8±1分钟。围手术期出血量不受经验影响。随着经验的增加,术后粘连在范围(P = 0.0001)、韧性(P = 0.004)、类型(P = 0.002)和炎症(P = 0.003)以及总分(P = 0.0002)方面均有所减少。这些变化与较短的手术时间相关,但与围手术期出血量无关。Douglas窝以及双侧子宫角周围粘连评分的强相关性证实了动物间粘连变异性的重要性。通过逻辑回归分析,Douglas窝的粘连可同时由子宫角的粘连(P = 0.0004,从而校正动物间变异性)、出血量(P = 0.01)和手术时间(P = 0.05)来解释。在机械性或双极损伤后,以及在Douglas窝或子宫角出现此类病变后的粘连情况未发现重大差异。总之,以手术时间以及在较小程度上以围手术期出血量表示的经验是术后粘连的一个主要协同因素,这表明在内镜粘连研究中应严格规范手术时间。通过使用标准对照病变,使每只动物自身作为对照,可以规避重要的动物间变异性。