Wilson E F, Davis J H, Bloom J D, Batten P J, Kamara S G
Medical School, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 1998 Jan;43(1):46-52.
This paper presents 15 deaths of suicidal persons in Oregon and Florida who, by their behavior, sufficiently provoked law enforcement officers into killing them. Four deaths were certified as suicide, one as undetermined and ten as homicide. All of the deaths are individually described in detail and their case characteristics are presented in a table. The method of study is a descriptive analysis of the case characteristics, including 21 variables which are determined to be relevant to the classification of death. The variables were grouped into six categories: (a) personal information; (b) criminal behavior during the fatal incident; (c) dangerous behavior during the fatal incident; (d) toxicological data; (e) mental illness information; and (f) certification data. From the analysis, reasons for the opinions on manner of death classification are presented. All incidents were perceived as life-threatening to law officers, family members, or hostages. All victims were male except one, and all were Caucasian except two. All victims resisted arrest and verbally threatened homicide during the fatal incident. Two-thirds of the victims took hostages. All victims possessed an apparent handgun or other weapon (knife, iron bar). All victims posed their weapon and threatened others during the incident, 60% of victims actually used the weapon with apparent intent to inflict damage to others. 40% of victims were intoxicated with alcohol but other drug-involvement was uncommon. Seven of 15 had previous suicide attempts, 40% had medically documented psychiatric diagnoses and 60% had reasonable historical evidence of psychiatric diagnoses, most commonly depression or substance abuse. One of the co-authors presents the case for some of the deaths to be certified as suicides, whereas two present the case for all to be certified as homicide. A brief discussion of psychiatric issues is also presented concerning individuals who use others to commit suicide and who may engage in dangerous and/or criminal behavior to do so. A major conclusion is that there is lack of a unified opinion on death certification procedures for individuals who have provoked law enforcement officers to kill them. For such cases, it is recommended that professional organizations of medical examiners/coroners develop guidelines to promote consistency in death certification practices including manner of death classification and selection of death certificate wording so that "police-assisted suicide" may be appropriately reported and studied.
本文介绍了俄勒冈州和佛罗里达州15起自杀者死亡事件,这些自杀者的行为足以激怒执法人员将其击毙。其中4起死亡被认定为自杀,1起死因不明,10起被认定为他杀。文中对每起死亡事件都进行了详细描述,并将其案件特征列于表格之中。研究方法是对案件特征进行描述性分析,包括21个被确定与死亡分类相关的变量。这些变量被分为六类:(a)个人信息;(b)致命事件中的犯罪行为;(c)致命事件中的危险行为;(d)毒理学数据;(e)精神疾病信息;(f)认证数据。通过分析,阐述了对死亡方式分类意见的原因。所有事件都被视为对执法人员、家庭成员或人质的生命构成威胁。除一名受害者为女性外,其他均为男性;除两名受害者为非裔外,其他均为白人。所有受害者在致命事件中都抗拒逮捕并口头上威胁要杀人。三分之二的受害者劫持了人质。所有受害者都持有明显的手枪或其他武器(刀、铁棍)。所有受害者在事件中都亮出武器并威胁他人,60%的受害者实际使用了武器,明显意图伤害他人。40%的受害者酒精中毒,但其他药物滥用情况并不常见。15名受害者中有7人曾有过自杀未遂经历,40%有医学记录的精神疾病诊断,60%有合理的精神疾病诊断历史证据,最常见的是抑郁症或药物滥用。其中一位共同作者提出部分死亡应被认定为自杀,而另外两位则主张所有死亡都应被认定为他杀。文中还针对利用他人实施自杀且可能为此从事危险和/或犯罪行为的个体展开了简短的精神疾病问题讨论。一个主要结论是,对于激怒执法人员将其击毙的个体,在死亡认证程序上缺乏统一意见。对于此类案件,建议法医/验尸官专业组织制定指导方针,以促进死亡认证实践的一致性,包括死亡方式分类和死亡证明措辞的选择,以便能够适当地报告和研究“警方协助自杀”情况。