Oltmanns T F, Turkheimer E, Strauss M E
University of Virginia.
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):53-66. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500108.
Assessment procedures for personality disorders (PDs) typically rely on self-reports, even though some people with PDs may be unable to view themselves realistically or are unwilling to report socially undesirable traits. Close associates may provide important information regarding the presence of PD traits. Peer nomination is a reliable and valid assessment procedure that can be adapted to the study of PDs for research purposes. This study focused on characteristic features that define narcissistic, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive PDs using information collected from both self and others in a nonclinical sample of women. It was designed to identify specific areas of agreement and discrepancy between self-report and peer assessment in the measurement of characteristic features of these disorders.
人格障碍（PDs）的评估程序通常依赖于自我报告，尽管有些患有PDs的人可能无法现实地看待自己，或者不愿意报告社会上不受欢迎的特质。亲密的同伴可能会提供有关PD特质存在的重要信息。同伴提名是一种可靠且有效的评估程序，可用于研究目的的PDs研究。本研究使用从非临床女性样本中的自我和他人收集的信息，重点关注定义自恋型、依赖型和强迫型人格障碍的特征。其目的是确定在这些障碍特征测量中自我报告和同伴评估之间的具体一致和差异领域。
