• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维生素D受体基因多态性:培养的皮肤成纤维细胞中配体结合及激素反应性分析

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms: analysis of ligand binding and hormone responsiveness in cultured skin fibroblasts.

作者信息

Gross C, Musiol I M, Eccleshall T R, Malloy P J, Feldman D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5103, USA.

出版信息

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Jan 26;242(3):467-73. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7986.

DOI:10.1006/bbrc.1997.7986
PMID:9464239
Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that polymorphisms in the gene encoding the vitamin D receptor (VDR) determine a portion of the genetic contribution to bone mineral density (BMD). Individuals homozygous for the allele lacking the Bsm I restriction site in the intron between exons 8 and 9 (BB genotype) have been found to have lower BMD than individuals homozygous for the allele having the Bsm I site (bb genotype). Interestingly, this polymorphism has also been associated with prostate cancer risk. The observed changes in BMD and prostate cancer risk might be due to an alteration in the function or abundance of the VDR leading to differential responsiveness of target cells to the action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3]. To test this hypothesis, we cultured dermal fibroblasts from donors with BB, Bb, and bb genotypes and determined the level of VDR expression and the cellular responsiveness to 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment. VDR abundance, affinity for [3H]1,25(OH)2D3, and VDR mRNA levels were not detectably different in BB cells compared to bb cells. Moreover, equal expression of both VDR gene alleles was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on mRNA from Bb fibroblasts. Fibroblast responsiveness to 1,25(OH)2D3, assessed by induction of 24-hydroxylase mRNA, was similar between BB and bb cell types in dose-response experiments. Although there were individual variations in the parameters we measured, there were no detectable or consistent differences in mean values from our small sample of cultured dermal fibroblasts. In conclusion, we did not detect significant differences in VDR properties or cellular responsiveness to 1,25(OH)2D3 that correlated with VDR genotype. Our findings suggest that these polymorphisms do not affect VDR function, but rather may be a marker for a nearby gene that is responsible for the genotype-associated variation in osteoporosis and prostate cancer risk.

摘要

最近的报告表明,编码维生素D受体(VDR)的基因多态性决定了对骨密度(BMD)遗传贡献的一部分。已发现,在第8和第9外显子之间的内含子中缺乏Bsm I限制性位点的等位基因的纯合个体(BB基因型),其骨密度低于具有Bsm I位点的等位基因的纯合个体(bb基因型)。有趣的是,这种多态性也与前列腺癌风险相关。观察到的骨密度变化和前列腺癌风险可能是由于VDR功能或丰度的改变,导致靶细胞对1,25 - 二羟基维生素D3 [1,25(OH)2D3]作用的反应性不同。为了验证这一假设,我们培养了来自具有BB、Bb和bb基因型供体的皮肤成纤维细胞,并测定了VDR表达水平以及细胞对1,25(OH)2D3处理的反应性。与bb细胞相比,BB细胞中VDR丰度、对[3H]1,25(OH)2D3的亲和力以及VDR mRNA水平没有明显差异。此外,通过对Bb成纤维细胞mRNA进行逆转录 - 聚合酶链反应(RT - PCR),检测到VDR基因的两个等位基因表达相等。在剂量反应实验中,通过诱导24 - 羟化酶mRNA评估,BB和bb细胞类型的成纤维细胞对1,25(OH)2D3的反应性相似。尽管我们测量的参数存在个体差异,但在我们培养的少量皮肤成纤维细胞样本中,平均值没有可检测到的或一致的差异。总之,我们没有检测到与VDR基因型相关的VDR特性或细胞对1,25(OH)2D3反应性的显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,这些多态性不会影响VDR功能,而可能是附近一个基因的标记,该基因负责与基因型相关的骨质疏松症和前列腺癌风险变异。

相似文献

1
Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms: analysis of ligand binding and hormone responsiveness in cultured skin fibroblasts.维生素D受体基因多态性:培养的皮肤成纤维细胞中配体结合及激素反应性分析
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Jan 26;242(3):467-73. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7986.
2
The vitamin D receptor gene start codon polymorphism: a functional analysis of FokI variants.维生素D受体基因起始密码子多态性:FokI变异体的功能分析
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Nov;13(11):1691-9. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.11.1691.
3
Regulation of vitamin D receptor abundance and responsiveness during differentiation of HT-29 human colon cancer cells.HT-29人结肠癌细胞分化过程中维生素D受体丰度和反应性的调节
Endocrinology. 1993 Apr;132(4):1808-14. doi: 10.1210/endo.132.4.8384998.
4
Hereditary vitamin D resistant rickets caused by a novel mutation in the vitamin D receptor that results in decreased affinity for hormone and cellular hyporesponsiveness.遗传性维生素D抵抗性佝偻病由维生素D受体的一种新突变引起,该突变导致对激素的亲和力降低和细胞低反应性。
J Clin Invest. 1997 Jan 15;99(2):297-304. doi: 10.1172/JCI119158.
5
Actions of vitamin D3, analogs on human prostate cancer cell lines: comparison with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.维生素D3类似物对人前列腺癌细胞系的作用:与1,25 - 二羟维生素D3的比较
Endocrinology. 1995 Jan;136(1):20-6. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.1.7530193.
6
[Bone density and bone metabolism regulated by vitamin D receptor allele polymorphism in a German study sample].[德国研究样本中维生素D受体等位基因多态性对骨密度和骨代谢的调节作用]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999 May-Jun;137(3):273-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1037406.
7
Evidence for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-independent transactivation by the vitamin D receptor: uncoupling the receptor and ligand in keratinocytes.维生素D受体介导的不依赖1,25-二羟基维生素D3的反式激活作用的证据:角质形成细胞中受体与配体的解偶联
J Biol Chem. 2007 Apr 13;282(15):10953-62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609717200. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
8
Tryptophan missense mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the vitamin D receptor causes severe resistance to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.维生素D受体配体结合域中的色氨酸错义突变导致对1,25 - 二羟基维生素D产生严重抗性。
J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Sep;17(9):1728-37. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1728.
9
Comparative effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and EB 1089 on mouse renal and intestinal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase.1,25-二羟基维生素D3与EB 1089对小鼠肾脏和肠道25-羟基维生素D3-24-羟化酶的比较作用
J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Dec;10(12):1951-9. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101215.
10
Regulation of the murine renal vitamin D receptor by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium.1,25-二羟维生素D3和钙对小鼠肾脏维生素D受体的调节
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):9733-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633774100. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and periodontitis in a Taiwanese Han population.台湾汉族人群中维生素D受体基因多态性与牙周炎的关联
J Dent Sci. 2017 Dec;12(4):360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk.维生素D受体基因多态性与癌症风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4153-69. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1544-y. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
Start codon FokI and intron 8 BsmI variants in the vitamin D receptor gene and susceptibility to colorectal cancer.
维生素 D 受体基因起始密码子 FokI 和内含子 8 BsmI 多态性与结直肠癌易感性的关系。
Mol Biol Rep. 2011 Oct;38(7):4765-70. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0613-1. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
4
Vitamin D receptor gene ApaI polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer.维生素 D 受体基因 ApaI 多态性与结直肠癌易感性相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jul;55(7):2008-13. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0989-8. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
A novel SNP in a vitamin D response element of the CYP24A1 promoter reduces protein binding, transactivation, and gene expression.CYP24A1启动子维生素D反应元件中的一个新型单核苷酸多态性降低了蛋白质结合、反式激活和基因表达。
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008 Nov;112(1-3):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
6
Genetic susceptibility to total hip arthroplasty failure: a preliminary study on the influence of matrix metalloproteinase 1, interleukin 6 polymorphisms and vitamin D receptor.全髋关节置换术失败的遗传易感性:关于基质金属蛋白酶1、白细胞介素6基因多态性及维生素D受体影响的初步研究
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Aug;66(8):1116-20. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062018. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
7
FokI and BsmI polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene and bone mineral density in a random Bulgarian population sample.维生素D受体基因的FokI和BsmI多态性与保加利亚随机人群样本中的骨矿物质密度
Endocrine. 2006 Jun;29(3):413-8. doi: 10.1385/endo:29:3:413.
8
Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are linked to and associated with adult height.维生素D受体基因多态性与成人身高相关联。
J Med Genet. 2005 Mar;42(3):228-34. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024083.
9
Genetic markers of osteoarticular disorders: facts and hopes.骨关节炎疾病的遗传标记:现状与展望。
Arthritis Res. 2001;3(5):270-80. doi: 10.1186/ar316. Epub 2001 Jul 4.
10
Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with breast cancer risk in a UK Caucasian population.维生素D受体基因多态性与英国白种人群的乳腺癌风险相关。
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jul 20;85(2):171-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1864.