Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Malec JF, Kokmen E, Tangalos E, Petersen RC
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Assessment. 1994 Jun;1(2):123-32. doi: 10.1177/1073191194001002002.
This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), including its internal consistency, sensitivity to age and education effects, pattern of change scores, convergent validity and predictive utility. Age and education effects and stability were assessed in a sample of 280 cognitively normal persons over age 55. All other features were assessed in a sample of 274 persons with cognitive impairment, including 221 newly diagnosed dementia patients and 53 patients with mild cognitive impairment. Both samples were drawn from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry. Within the normal sample, Pearson correlation coefficients for DRS Total score with age, education and intelligence were all significant, p < .0001; MAYO Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) shared approximately 20% variance with DRS Total score. Internal consistency was greater than .7 for Construction, Conceptualization, Memory, and Total score, greater than .65 for Attention and less than .5 for Initiation and Perseveration. DRS subscale scores for Memory, Attention, and Conceptualization were significantly correlated with appropriate indices from the WAIS-R or Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, as assessed in the Mayo Older Americans Normative Studies, providing convergent validity for these DRS scales. Importantly, proportional hazards modeling revealed initial DRS Total score to be a significant predictor of longitudinal institutionalization and mortality outcomes.
本研究调查了马蒂斯痴呆评定量表(DRS)的心理测量特性,包括其内部一致性、对年龄和教育影响的敏感性、变化分数模式、收敛效度和预测效用。在280名55岁以上认知正常的人群样本中评估了年龄和教育影响以及稳定性。在274名认知障碍患者样本中评估了所有其他特征,其中包括221名新诊断的痴呆患者和53名轻度认知障碍患者。两个样本均取自梅奥诊所阿尔茨海默病患者登记处。在正常样本中,DRS总分与年龄、教育程度和智力的皮尔逊相关系数均具有显著性,p <.0001;梅奥全量表智商(FSIQ)与DRS总分共享约20%的方差。结构、概念化、记忆和总分的内部一致性大于.7,注意力的内部一致性大于.65,启动和持续性的内部一致性小于.5。在梅奥老年美国人标准化研究中评估发现,记忆、注意力和概念化的DRS分量表分数与韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)或韦氏记忆量表修订版(Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised)的相应指标显著相关,为这些DRS量表提供了收敛效度。重要的是,比例风险模型显示,初始DRS总分是纵向机构化和死亡率结果的显著预测指标。