Suppr超能文献

输精管结扎术与输卵管绝育术后女性遗憾情绪的比较。

A comparison of women's regret after vasectomy versus tubal sterilization.

作者信息

Jamieson Denise J, Kaufman Steven C, Costello Caroline, Hillis Susan D, Marchbanks Polly A, Peterson Herbert B

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01981-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 5-year cumulative probability of regret and risk factors for regret among women whose husbands underwent vasectomy with women after tubal sterilization.

METHODS

A total of 525 women whose husbands underwent vasectomy were compared with 3672 women who underwent tubal sterilization in a prospective, multicenter, cohort study.

RESULTS

The cumulative probability of a woman expressing regret within 5 years after her husband's vasectomy was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6, 8.6), which was similar to the 5-year cumulative probability of regret among women after tubal sterilization (7.0%, 95% CI 5.8, 8.1). Women who reported substantial conflict with their husbands before vasectomy were more than 25 times more likely to request that their husband have a reversal than women who did not report such conflict (rate ratio 25.3, 95% CI 2.9, 217.2). Similarly, women who reported substantial conflict with their husbands or partners before tubal sterilization were more then three times as likely to regret their decision and more than five times as likely to request a reversal than women who did not report such conflict (rate ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.4, 7.0, and rate ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.6, 17.6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most women did not express regret after their husband's vasectomy and the probability of regret was similar to sterilized women. However, when there was substantial conflict between a woman and her husband before vasectomy or tubal sterilization, the probability of subsequent request for reversal was increased.

摘要

目的

比较丈夫接受输精管结扎术的女性与接受输卵管绝育术的女性的5年累积后悔概率及后悔的风险因素。

方法

在一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究中,将525名丈夫接受输精管结扎术的女性与3672名接受输卵管绝育术的女性进行比较。

结果

丈夫接受输精管结扎术后5年内表示后悔的女性累积概率为6.1%(95%置信区间[CI] 3.6, 8.6),这与输卵管绝育术后女性的5年累积后悔概率相似(7.0%,95% CI 5.8, 8.1)。报告在输精管结扎术前与丈夫存在严重冲突的女性要求丈夫进行复通术的可能性比未报告此类冲突的女性高25倍以上(率比25.3,95% CI 2.9, 217.2)。同样,报告在输卵管绝育术前与丈夫或伴侣存在严重冲突的女性后悔其决定的可能性是未报告此类冲突女性的三倍多,要求复通术的可能性是其五倍多(率比分别为3.1,95% CI 1.4, 7.0和率比5.4,95% CI 1.6, 17.6)。

结论

大多数女性在丈夫接受输精管结扎术后未表示后悔,后悔概率与接受绝育术的女性相似。然而,当女性与丈夫在输精管结扎术或输卵管绝育术前存在严重冲突时,随后要求复通术的概率会增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验