Wülknitz P
Henkel KGaA, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Adv Dent Res. 1997 Nov;11(4):576-9. doi: 10.1177/08959374970110042701.
For 41 toothpastes available to European consumers in 1995, the cleaning efficacy was evaluated in comparison with abrasivity on dentin (RDA value). For cleaning power assessment, a modified pellicle cleaning ratio (PCR) measurement method was developed. The method is characterized by a five-day tea-staining procedure on bovine front teeth slabs on a rotating wheel, standardized brushing of the slabs in a V8 cross-brushing machine, and brightness measurement by a chromametric technique. All tested products were in accordance with the new DIN/ISO standard 11,609 for toothpastes in terms of dentin abrasivity. Not a single product exceeded an RDA value of 200. The majority of toothpastes (80%) had an RDA value below 100. Only three products surpassed the reference in cleaning power. Most products (73%) had a cleaning power (PCR value) between 20 and 80. The correlation between cleaning power and dentin abrasion was low (r = 0.66), which can be explained with the different influence on dentin and stains by factors like abrasive type, particle surface and size, as well as the chemical influence of other toothpaste ingredients. Some major trends could be shown on the basis of abrasive types. The ratio PCR to RDA was rather good in most silica-based toothpastes. A lower ratio was found in some products containing calcium carbonate or aluminum trihydrate as the only abrasive. The addition of other abrasives, such as polishing alumina, showed improved cleaning power. Some active ingredients, especially sequenstrants such as sodium tripolyphosphate or AHBP, also improve the PCR/RDA ratio by stain-dissolving action without being abrasive. The data for some special anti-stain products did not differ significantly from standard products. Compared with data measured in 1988, a general trend toward reduced abrasivity without loss of cleaning efficacy could be noticed on the European toothpaste market. This may be mostly due to the increased use of high-performance abrasives such as hydrated silica.
1995年,针对欧洲消费者可获得的41种牙膏,对其清洁功效与牙本质磨损性(RDA值)进行了评估。为了评估清洁能力,开发了一种改良的薄膜清洁率(PCR)测量方法。该方法的特点是在旋转轮上对牛前牙牙片进行为期五天的茶渍处理,在V8交叉刷牙机中对牙片进行标准化刷牙,并通过色度技术测量亮度。就牙本质磨损性而言,所有测试产品均符合新的牙膏DIN/ISO标准11609。没有一个产品的RDA值超过200。大多数牙膏(80%)的RDA值低于100。只有三种产品的清洁能力超过了参考值。大多数产品(73%)的清洁能力(PCR值)在20到80之间。清洁能力与牙本质磨损之间的相关性较低(r = 0.66),这可以通过磨料类型、颗粒表面和尺寸等因素对牙本质和污渍的不同影响以及其他牙膏成分的化学影响来解释。基于磨料类型可以看出一些主要趋势。大多数二氧化硅基牙膏的PCR与RDA之比相当不错。在一些仅含有碳酸钙或三水合铝作为磨料的产品中发现该比值较低。添加其他磨料,如抛光氧化铝,显示出清洁能力有所提高。一些活性成分,特别是三聚磷酸钠或AHBP等螯合剂,也通过溶解污渍的作用提高了PCR/RDA比值,且无磨损性。一些特殊抗污产品的数据与标准产品没有显著差异。与1988年测得的数据相比,可以注意到欧洲牙膏市场上存在一种在不损失清洁功效的情况下降低磨损性的总体趋势。这可能主要归因于高性能磨料如水合二氧化硅的使用增加。