Jacobs T J
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1997;45(4):1034-59.
Certain difficulties arise in the positions of both those who embrace the intersubjective approach in psychoanalysis and those who oppose it. Various factors that have led to misunderstandings on both sides of the question are identified, and several recent studies highlighting the importance of unconscious communication both in development and in clinical work are cited to buttress the argument that efforts to understand the mind of the analyst as it registers and resonates with this kind of communication open a still insufficiently explored pathway to the unconscious of the patient, one that may lead to major advances in analytic technique.
在精神分析中,无论是支持主体间性方法的人还是反对该方法的人,他们的立场都存在某些困难。文中指出了导致问题双方产生误解的各种因素,并引用了几项近期的研究,这些研究强调了无意识交流在发展和临床工作中的重要性,以此来支持这样一种观点:努力去理解分析师的心智,因为它会记录并与这种交流产生共鸣,这为通向患者无意识开辟了一条尚未得到充分探索的途径,这条途径可能会带来分析技术上的重大进展。