Kaufman A S, Ford-Richards J M, McLean J E
Yale University School of Medicine, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Jan;54(1):19-33. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199801)54:1<19::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-p.
Black-white differences on the Strong Interest Inventory were examined for a heterogeneous sample of 756 Whites and 85 Blacks aged 16 to 65 years. Multivariate and univariate analyses of variance and covariance were conducted. Race, gender, and IQ were independent variables; the six Holland General Occupational Themes and the 23 Basic Interest Scales were dependent variables; and educational attainment was the covariate. All interactions were nonsignificant, but race was consistently a significant main effect. In general, Whites scored higher than Blacks on Realistic and Investigative themes and scales, and Blacks scored higher in the Social, Enterprising, and Conventional areas. These findings were viewed in the context of counselors' and psychologists' roles in interpreting interest pattern of Black individuals.
对756名年龄在16至65岁之间的白人和85名黑人组成的异质样本，研究了其在《斯特朗职业兴趣量表》上的黑白差异。进行了多变量和单变量方差分析与协方差分析。种族、性别和智商为自变量；六个霍兰德一般职业主题和23个基本兴趣量表为因变量；教育程度为协变量。所有交互作用均无显著意义，但种族始终是显著的主效应。总体而言，白人在现实型和研究型主题及量表上的得分高于黑人，而黑人在社会型、企业型和传统型领域得分更高。在咨询师和心理学家解读黑人个体兴趣模式的角色背景下审视了这些发现。
