Freeman T, Fischer R P
J Trauma. 1976 Jul;16(7):538-42. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197607000-00004.
Thirty-eight patients with acute diaphragmatic rupture secondary to blunt trauma have been reviewed. Peritoneal lavage is diagnostically inexact in patients with diaphragmatic rupture. One-fourth of the patients had falsely negative peritoneal lavages during their initial evaluation. All four patients without associated intra-abdominal injuries had falsely negative peritoneal lavages, as did four of 30 patients (13%) with significantly associated intra-abdominal injuries. We conclude from these data that: 1) peritoneal lavage is falsely negative in patients with isolated diaphragmatic rupture; 2) positive peritoneal lavage in patients with diaphragmatic rupture results from associated intra-abdominal injuries; and 3) peritoneal lavage may be falsely negative despite significant intra-abdominal injuries; because of herniation of injured organ(s) into the thoracic cavity, thus bleeding is excluded from the peritoneal cavity.
对38例钝性创伤继发急性膈肌破裂的患者进行了回顾性研究。腹腔灌洗对膈肌破裂患者的诊断并不准确。四分之一的患者在初始评估时腹腔灌洗结果为假阴性。所有4例无相关腹内损伤的患者腹腔灌洗结果均为假阴性,30例有明显相关腹内损伤的患者中也有4例(13%)灌洗结果为假阴性。从这些数据中我们得出以下结论:1)孤立性膈肌破裂患者的腹腔灌洗结果可能为假阴性;2)膈肌破裂患者腹腔灌洗结果为阳性是由相关腹内损伤导致的;3)尽管存在明显的腹内损伤,腹腔灌洗结果仍可能为假阴性,这是因为受伤器官疝入胸腔,从而使出血未进入腹腔。