Kawano F, Koran A, Nuryanti A, Inoue S
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Jan-Feb;10(1):55-60.
The cushioning effect of soft denture liners was evaluated by using a free drop test with an accelerometer. Materials tested included SuperSoft (Coe Laboratories, Chicago, IL), Kurepeet-Dough (Kreha Chemical, Tokyo), Molteno Soft (Molten, Hiroshima, Japan), and Molloplast-B (Molloplast Regneri, Karlsruhe, Germany). All materials were found to reduce the impact force when compared to acrylic denture base resin. A 2.4-mm layer of soft denture material demonstrated good impact absorption, and Molloplast-B and Molteno had excellent impact absorption. When the soft denture liner was kept in an accelerated aging chamber for 900 hours, the damping effect recorded increased for all materials tested. Aging of all materials also affected the cushioning effect.
通过使用带有加速度计的自由落体试验来评估软质义齿衬垫的缓冲效果。测试的材料包括SuperSoft(Coe Laboratories,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州)、Kurepeet-Dough(Kreha Chemical,东京)、Molteno Soft(Molten,广岛,日本)和Molloplast-B(Molloplast Regneri,卡尔斯鲁厄,德国)。与丙烯酸义齿基托树脂相比,所有材料都能降低冲击力。2.4毫米厚的软质义齿材料层表现出良好的冲击吸收性能,Molloplast-B和Molteno具有优异的冲击吸收性能。当软质义齿衬垫在加速老化箱中放置900小时后,所有测试材料的记录阻尼效果均有所增加。所有材料的老化也会影响缓冲效果。