Bullen C, Beaglehole R
Department of Community Health, University of Auckland.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997 Dec;21(7):688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01781.x.
Data from the Auckland Coronary or Stroke (ARCOS) study for the years 1983 to 1992 were analysed to describe 28-day case fatality rates from coronary heart disease among Europeans, Maori and Pacific Islands people in Auckland, New Zealand. The case fatality rate was consistently higher in each age group and for both sexes among Maori and Pacific Islands people than in Europeans. Age-standardised case fatalities for Maori and Pacific Islands people were similar at around 65 per cent, compared with around 45 per cent among Europeans, and these differences were not explained by ethnic differences in possible underreporting of nonfatal myocardial infarction, in socioeconomic status, smoking, symptoms or past myocardial infarction. There was evidence of a more rapid progression of acute coronary events to a fatal outcome among Maori and Pacific Islands people, partly explained by delays in access to life support and coronary care: greater proportions of Pacific Islands people than Maori or Europeans who died did so within an hour of onset of symptoms (56 per cent of Pacific Islands people, 47 per cent of Maori, 45 per cent of Europeans). Pacific Islands and Maori people with acute coronary events took longer to reach a coronary care unit (mean times: Pacific Islands people 8.6 hours, Maori 7.4 hours, Europeans 6.7 hours, P < 0.05), although the median times were not significantly different; life-support units were used by a majority of Pacific Islands people and Europeans (57 per cent and 55 per cent, respectively), compared with only 46 per cent of Maori, but hospital care was similar for the three groups. Further qualitative and quantitative research is needed to investigate the reasons for these ethnic disparities in case fatality rates.
对1983年至1992年奥克兰冠心病或中风(ARCOS)研究的数据进行了分析,以描述新西兰奥克兰欧洲人、毛利人和太平洋岛民中冠心病的28天病死率。在每个年龄组以及毛利人和太平洋岛民的男女中,病死率始终高于欧洲人。毛利人和太平洋岛民的年龄标准化病死率相似,约为65%,而欧洲人约为45%,这些差异无法用非致命性心肌梗死报告不足、社会经济地位、吸烟、症状或既往心肌梗死方面的种族差异来解释。有证据表明,毛利人和太平洋岛民中急性冠状动脉事件发展为致命结局的速度更快,部分原因是获得生命支持和冠心病护理的延迟:在出现症状后一小时内死亡的太平洋岛民比例高于毛利人或欧洲人(太平洋岛民为56%,毛利人为47%,欧洲人为45%)。患有急性冠状动脉事件的太平洋岛民和毛利人到达冠心病护理病房的时间更长(平均时间:太平洋岛民8.6小时,毛利人7.4小时,欧洲人6.7小时,P<0.05),尽管中位数时间没有显著差异;大多数太平洋岛民和欧洲人使用了生命支持病房(分别为57%和55%),而毛利人仅为46%,但三组的医院护理情况相似。需要进一步开展定性和定量研究,以调查这些病死率种族差异的原因。