Gibby G L, Schwab W K, Miller W C
Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0254, USA.
J Clin Monit. 1997 Nov;13(6):345-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1007499527678.
To study whether an electrosurgery device interferes with the operation of a low-power spread-spectrum wireless network adapter.
Nonrandomized, unblinded trials with controls, conducted in the corridor of our institution's operating suite using two portable computers equipped with RoamAbout omnidirectional 250 mW spread-spectrum 928 MHz wireless network adapters. To simulate high power electrosurgery interference, a 100-watt continuous electrocoagulation arc was maintained five feet from the receiving adapter, while device reported signal to noise values were measured at 150 feet and 400 feet distance between the wireless-networked computers. At 150 feet range, and with continuous 100-watt electrocoagulation arc five feet from one computer, error-corrected local area net throughput was measured by sending and receiving a large file multiple times.
The reported signal to noise (N = 50) decreased with electrocoagulation from 36.42+/-3.47 (control) to 31.85+/-3.64 (electrocoagulation) (p < 0.001) at 400 feet inter-adapter distance, and from 64.53+/-1.43 (control) to 60.12+/-3.77 (electrocoagulation) (p < 0.001) at 150 feet inter-adapter distance. There was no statistically significant change in network throughput (average 93 kbyte/second) at 150 feet inter-adapter distance, either transmitting or receiving during continuous 100 Watt electrocoagulation arc.
The manufacturer indicates "acceptable" performance will be obtained with signal to noise values as low as 20. In view of this, while electrocoagulation affects this spread spectrum network adapter, the effects are small even at 400 feet. At a distance of 150 feet, no discernible effect on network communications was found, suggesting that if other obstructions are minimal, within a wide range on one floor of an operating suite, network communications may be maintained using the technology of this wireless spread spectrum network adapter. The impact of such adapters on cardiac pacemakers should be studied. Wireless spread spectrum network adapters are an attractive technology for mobile computer communications in the operating room.
研究一种电外科设备是否会干扰低功率扩频无线网络适配器的运行。
在我们机构手术室的走廊进行非随机、非盲对照试验,使用两台配备RoamAbout全向250毫瓦928兆赫扩频无线网络适配器的便携式计算机。为模拟高功率电外科干扰,在距接收适配器5英尺处维持100瓦连续电凝弧,同时在无线网络连接的计算机之间150英尺和400英尺距离处测量设备报告的信噪比。在150英尺范围内,且在距一台计算机5英尺处有连续100瓦电凝弧时,通过多次发送和接收一个大文件来测量纠错局域网吞吐量。
在适配器间距400英尺时,报告的信噪比(N = 50)在电凝时从36.42±3.47(对照)降至31.85±3.64(电凝)(p < 0.001),在适配器间距150英尺时从64.53±1.43(对照)降至60.12±3.77(电凝)(p < 0.001)。在适配器间距150英尺处,连续100瓦电凝弧期间发送或接收时,网络吞吐量(平均93千字节/秒)无统计学显著变化。
制造商表明信噪比低至20时将获得“可接受”性能。鉴于此,虽然电凝会影响这种扩频网络适配器,但即使在400英尺处影响也很小。在150英尺距离处,未发现对网络通信有明显影响,这表明如果其他障碍物最少,在手术室一层的很大范围内,使用这种无线扩频网络适配器技术可维持网络通信。应研究此类适配器对心脏起搏器的影响。无线扩频网络适配器是手术室移动计算机通信的一种有吸引力的技术。