Suppr超能文献

荷兰农村人口中痴呆症的患病率以及DSM-III-R和CAMDEX标准对轻度和更严重形式患病率的影响。

Prevalence of dementia in a rural Netherlands population and the influence of DSM-III-R and CAMDEX criteria for the prevalence of mild and more severe forms.

作者信息

Boersma F, Eefsting J A, van den Brink W, Koeter M, van Tilburg W

机构信息

Nursing Home Anna Schotanus, Heerenveen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;51(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00265-5.

Abstract

To obtain estimates of the prevalence of mild and moderate/severe dementia among people age 65 and over, applying criteria for severity of both DSM-III-R and CAMDEX, a two-stage community-based study was conducted in a rural area of the Netherlands. In the first stage, 2191 subjects (out of the target population of 2655) participated in an interview which included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Based on MMSE score, a non-proportional random sample (n=496) was drawn for the second stage. A total of 421 subjects responded and were subsequently examined using the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX). In determining the severity of dementia, criteria of both DSM-III-R and CAMDEX were applied. Overall prevalence for both classification systems was 6.5%. There was a large discrepancy between the two classification systems with regard to the criteria for rating severity. The prevalence of moderate/severe dementia using DSM-III-R criteria was twice as high as the prevalence using CAMDEX criteria. These findings reflect the differences between DSM-III-R and CAMDEX in descriptions of dementia severity. Rating according to CAMDEX predicts institutionalization in specialized nursing homes somewhat better than staging according to DSM-III-R. Both content analysis and institutionalization data suggest that the CAMDEX operationalization of rating severity seems preferable.

摘要

为了根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和剑桥老年精神疾病检查表(CAMDEX)的严重程度标准,估算65岁及以上人群中轻度和中度/重度痴呆症的患病率,在荷兰的一个农村地区开展了一项基于社区的两阶段研究。在第一阶段,2191名受试者(目标人群为2655名)参与了包括简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)在内的访谈。根据MMSE评分,抽取了一个非比例随机样本(n = 496)进入第二阶段。共有421名受试者做出回应,随后使用剑桥老年精神疾病检查表(CAMDEX)对他们进行了检查。在确定痴呆症的严重程度时,采用了DSM-III-R和CAMDEX的标准。两种分类系统的总体患病率均为6.5%。在评定严重程度的标准方面,这两种分类系统存在很大差异。采用DSM-III-R标准的中度/重度痴呆症患病率是采用CAMDEX标准患病率的两倍。这些发现反映了DSM-III-R和CAMDEX在痴呆症严重程度描述方面的差异。根据CAMDEX进行评定比根据DSM-III-R进行分期能更好地预测入住专业疗养院的情况。内容分析和入住机构数据均表明,CAMDEX对严重程度评定的操作化似乎更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验