Mayer-Davis E J, D'Agostino R, Karter A J, Haffner S M, Rewers M J, Saad M, Bergman R N
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.
JAMA. 1998 Mar 4;279(9):669-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.9.669.
Exercise training is associated with improved insulin sensitivity (SI), but the potential impact of habitual, nonvigorous activity is uncertain.
To determine whether habitual, nonvigorous physical activity, as well as vigorous and overall activity, is associated with better SI.
A multicultural epidemiologic study.
The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, conducted in Oakland, Calif; Los Angeles, Calif; the San Luis Valley, Colo; and San Antonio, Tex.
A total of 1467 men and women of African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white ethnicity, aged 40 to 69 years, with glucose tolerance ranging from normal to mild non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Insulin sensitivity as measured by an intravenous glucose tolerance test.
The mean SI for individuals who participated in vigorous activity 5 or more times per week was 1.59 min(-1) x microU(-1) x mL(-1) x 10(-4) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.79) compared with 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) for those who rarely or never participated in vigorous activity, after adjusting for potential confounders (P<.001). When habitual physical activity (estimated energy expenditure [EEE]) was assessed by 1-year recall of activities, the correlation coefficient between SI and total EEE was 0.14 (P<.001). After adjustment for confounders, vigorous and nonvigorous levels of EEE (metabolic equivalent levels > or = 6.0 and <6.0, respectively) were each positively and independently associated with SI (P< or =.01 for each). The association was attenuated after adjustment for the potential mediators, body mass index (a measure of weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters), and waist-to-hip ratio. Results were similar for subgroups of sex, ethnicity, and diabetes.
Increased participation in nonvigorous as well as overall and vigorous physical activity was associated with significantly higher SI. These findings lend further support to current public health recommendations for increased moderate-intensity physical activity on most days.
运动训练与胰岛素敏感性(SI)的改善有关,但习惯性非剧烈活动的潜在影响尚不确定。
确定习惯性非剧烈身体活动以及剧烈和总体活动是否与更好的SI相关。
一项多文化流行病学研究。
在加利福尼亚州奥克兰、加利福尼亚州洛杉矶、科罗拉多州圣路易斯谷和得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥进行的胰岛素抵抗动脉粥样硬化研究。
共有1467名年龄在40至69岁之间的非裔美国人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人男性和女性,其糖耐量范围从正常到轻度非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病。
通过静脉葡萄糖耐量试验测量的胰岛素敏感性。
在调整潜在混杂因素后(P<0.001),每周进行5次或更多次剧烈活动的个体的平均SI为1.59分钟⁻¹×微单位⁻¹×毫升⁻¹×10⁻⁴(95%置信区间[CI],1.39 - 1.79),而很少或从不进行剧烈活动的个体为0.90(95%CI,0.83 - 0.97)。当通过对活动进行1年回顾来评估习惯性身体活动(估计能量消耗[EEE])时,SI与总EEE之间的相关系数为0.14(P<0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,EEE的剧烈和非剧烈水平(代谢当量水平分别>或 = 6.0和<6.0)均与SI呈正相关且独立相关(每项P≤0.01)。在调整潜在中介因素体重指数(以千克为单位的体重除以以米为单位的身高的平方)和腰臀比后,这种关联减弱。性别、种族和糖尿病亚组的结果相似。
增加非剧烈以及总体和剧烈身体活动的参与与显著更高的SI相关。这些发现进一步支持了当前关于大多数日子增加中等强度身体活动的公共卫生建议。