Teeter J G, Bleecker E R
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):272-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.272.
To characterize the relationship between symptoms and the degree of airway obstruction as determined by the FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in a cohort of adult patients attending a university-based urban asthma clinic.
Each of six current asthma symptoms, including cough, dyspnea, wheeze, chest tightness, sputum production, and nocturnal awakening was rated by patients on a 0 (none) to 4 (constant) scale at initial and first follow-up clinic evaluations. Spirometry and PEF were measured at the initial clinic visit and PEF was measured at all follow-up visits.
Sixty-seven adult patients with chronic asthma.
Asthma symptoms did not correlate with the degree of airway obstruction as determined by the FEV1 (percent predicted FEV1 vs total symptoms: r=0.143; p=0.263; n=70) and only correlated poorly with PEF (percent predicted PEF vs total symptoms: r=0.384; p=0.0029; n=58). Subjective wheezing was the best individual predictor of the level of airway obstruction in this group of patients. When reassessed an average of 7.9 weeks later, patients reported significant improvement in several symptoms, including those of wheeze, chest tightness, dyspnea, and nocturnal awakening. However, this symptomatic improvement was not associated with improvement in the level of airway obstruction.
Asthma symptoms correlate poorly with the level of airway obstruction as determined by the FEV1 and PEF. Following treatment, subjective improvement in asthma symptoms may occur without improvement in the level of airway obstruction. These results support the recommendation to measure airway obstruction objectively when assessing adult patients with chronic asthma.
在一组就诊于大学城市哮喘诊所的成年患者中,描述症状与由第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)所确定的气道阻塞程度之间的关系。
在初始及首次随访门诊评估中,患者对六种当前哮喘症状(包括咳嗽、呼吸困难、喘息、胸闷、咳痰和夜间觉醒)中的每一种,按照从0(无)到4(持续存在)的量表进行评分。在初始门诊就诊时测量肺功能和PEF,并在所有随访就诊时测量PEF。
67例成年慢性哮喘患者。
哮喘症状与由FEV1所确定的气道阻塞程度不相关(预计FEV1百分比与总症状:r = 0.143;p = 0.263;n = 70),且与PEF仅存在较弱的相关性(预计PEF百分比与总症状:r = 0.384;p = 0.0029;n = 58)。在这组患者中,主观喘息是气道阻塞水平的最佳个体预测指标。在平均7.9周后重新评估时,患者报告几种症状有显著改善,包括喘息、胸闷、呼吸困难和夜间觉醒等症状。然而,这种症状改善与气道阻塞水平的改善无关。
哮喘症状与由FEV1和PEF所确定的气道阻塞水平相关性较差。治疗后,哮喘症状可能出现主观改善,但气道阻塞水平并无改善。这些结果支持在评估成年慢性哮喘患者时客观测量气道阻塞的建议。