Kohl H W, Dunn A L, Marcus B H, Blair S N
Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, Dallas, TX 75230, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Feb;30(2):275-83. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199802000-00016.
We report here the design and baseline data from Project Active, a 2-yr randomized trial designed to compare the effectiveness of a Lifestyle physical activity intervention with the traditional Structured exercise prescription approach. Primary outcome measures are energy expenditure in physical activity (estimated by kcal per kilogram of body weight of energy expenditure) and cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by maximal oxygen uptake). The participants, 235 initially sedentary and apparently healthy adults, were randomized into either the Lifestyle or Structured intervention groups. The Lifestyle treatment consists of a personalized approach that accounts for an individual's motivational readiness and preferences for integrating physical activity into daily routines. The Structured approach is the familiar exercise prescription that is based on a frequency, intensity, and duration formula. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that there will be a difference in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness measures between the two conditions at the end of 24 months. The secondary hypothesis is that both groups will make significant improvements from baseline in physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness at the end of 6 months. Six months of active intervention are followed by 18 months of a tapered follow-up maintenance intervention in both groups. Primary outcome measures are measured after 6 and 24 months.
我们在此报告“积极项目”的设计及基线数据,这是一项为期两年的随机试验,旨在比较生活方式体育活动干预与传统结构化运动处方方法的有效性。主要结局指标为体育活动中的能量消耗(以每千克体重的千卡能量消耗估算)和心肺适能(通过最大摄氧量测量)。235名最初久坐且看似健康的成年人被随机分为生活方式干预组或结构化干预组。生活方式干预包括一种个性化方法,该方法考虑个人的动机准备情况以及将体育活动融入日常生活的偏好。结构化方法是基于频率、强度和持续时间公式的常见运动处方。要检验的主要假设是,在24个月结束时,两种情况之间的体育活动和心肺适能指标会存在差异。次要假设是,两组在6个月结束时,体育活动和心肺适能均会较基线有显著改善。两组在进行6个月的积极干预后,接着是18个月的逐步减少的随访维持干预。主要结局指标在6个月和24个月后进行测量。