Simons-Morton D G, Calfas K J, Oldenburg B, Burton N W
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Rockledge Centre, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7936, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):413-30. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00078-6.
This paper reviews studies of physical activity interventions in health care settings to determine effects on physical activity and/or fitness and characteristics of successful interventions.
Studies testing interventions to promote physical activity in health care settings for primary prevention (patients without disease) and secondary prevention (patients with cardiovascular disease [CVD]) were identified by computerized search methods and reference lists of reviews and articles. Inclusion criteria included assignment to intervention and control groups, physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness outcome measures, and, for the secondary prevention studies, measurement 12 or more months after randomization. The number of studies with statistically significant effects was determined overall as well as for studies testing interventions with various characteristics.
Twelve studies of primary prevention were identified, seven of which were randomized. Three of four randomized studies with short-term measurement (4 weeks to 3 months after randomization), and two of five randomized studies with long-term measurement (6 months after randomization) achieved significant effect on physical activity. Twenty-four randomized studies of CVD secondary prevention were identified; 13 achieved significant effects on activity and/or fitness at twelve or more months. Studies with measurement at two time points showed decaying effects over time, particularly if the intervention were discontinued. Successful interventions contained multiple contacts, behavioral approaches, supervised exercise, provision of equipment, and/or continuing intervention. Many studies had methodologic problems such as low follow-up rates.
Interventions in health care settings can increase physical activity for both primary and secondary prevention. Long-term effects are more likely with continuing intervention and multiple intervention components such as supervised exercise, provision of equipment, and behavioral approaches. Recommendations for additional research are given.
本文回顾了在医疗环境中进行的身体活动干预研究,以确定其对身体活动和/或健康状况的影响以及成功干预的特征。
通过计算机检索方法以及综述和文章的参考文献列表,确定了测试旨在促进医疗环境中身体活动以进行一级预防(无疾病患者)和二级预防(心血管疾病[CVD]患者)的干预措施的研究。纳入标准包括分为干预组和对照组、身体活动或心肺健康状况的结局测量,对于二级预防研究,在随机分组后12个月或更长时间进行测量。总体上确定了具有统计学显著效果的研究数量,以及测试具有各种特征的干预措施的研究数量。
确定了12项一级预防研究,其中7项为随机对照研究。4项进行短期测量(随机分组后4周至3个月)的随机对照研究中有3项,以及5项进行长期测量(随机分组后6个月)的随机对照研究中有2项,在身体活动方面取得了显著效果。确定了24项CVD二级预防的随机对照研究;13项在12个月或更长时间对活动和/或健康状况取得了显著效果。在两个时间点进行测量的研究显示效果随时间衰减,特别是如果干预措施停止。成功的干预措施包括多次接触、行为方法、监督锻炼、提供设备和/或持续干预。许多研究存在方法学问题,如随访率低。
医疗环境中的干预措施可以增加一级和二级预防中的身体活动。持续干预以及多种干预成分,如监督锻炼、提供设备和行为方法,更有可能产生长期效果。给出了进一步研究的建议。