Linn W S, Solomon J C, Gong H, Avol E L, Peters J M
Environmental Health Service, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, Downey, CA 90242, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Feb;40(2):148-52. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199802000-00011.
In respiratory health surveys involving multiple spirometers, spirometer differences may introduce important biases. We investigated temperature measurement variability as a cause of spirometer differences. Digital thermometers recorded internal (cylinder) and external (outer casing) temperatures of six similar rolling-seal spirometers during field use and in laboratory tests at controlled room temperatures. Internal and external thermometers substantially agreed in recording spirometer temperature changes, which lagged room temperature changes. Offsets of individual thermometers from overall mean readings were roughly the same in field testing of 3908 students in > 60 schools over 5 months and in subsequent laboratory tests. Thermometers differed by as much as 1.3 degrees C, causing differences as large as 0.8% in vital capacity measurements. We conclude that (1) interior and exterior temperatures of typical rolling-seal spirometers do not differ greatly, although both may differ from surrounding air temperature; and (2) variations between individual digital thermometers may be large enough to bias spirometric data appreciably in large-scale surveys. Variations should be controlled by selection of similar-reading thermometers and/or correction to a uniform standard.
在涉及多台肺活量计的呼吸健康调查中,肺活量计之间的差异可能会引入重要偏差。我们研究了温度测量变异性作为肺活量计差异的一个原因。数字温度计记录了六台类似的滚动密封式肺活量计在现场使用以及在可控室温的实验室测试期间的内部(气缸)和外部(外壳)温度。内部和外部温度计在记录肺活量计温度变化方面基本一致,且肺活量计温度变化滞后于室温变化。在5个月内对60多所学校的3908名学生进行的现场测试以及随后的实验室测试中,各个温度计与总体平均读数的偏差大致相同。温度计之间的差异高达1.3摄氏度,导致肺活量测量值的差异高达0.8%。我们得出结论:(1)典型的滚动密封式肺活量计的内部和外部温度差异不大,尽管两者都可能与周围空气温度不同;(2)在大规模调查中,各个数字温度计之间的差异可能大到足以显著影响肺活量测定数据。应通过选择读数相似的温度计和/或校正到统一标准来控制这些差异。