Suppr超能文献

柔软度及导致重复呼吸的可能性:婴儿猝死综合征高风险与低风险婴儿使用的床上用品差异。

Softness and potential to cause rebreathing: Differences in bedding used by infants at high and low risk for sudden infant death syndrome.

作者信息

Kemp J S, Livne M, White D K, Arfken C L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1998 Feb;132(2):234-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70437-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to determine whether bedding used by infants, who are at either high or low risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), differs in physical properties favoring rebreathing of exhaled gases.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared softness and limitation of carbon dioxide dispersal by bedding, using a mechanical model. A questionnaire was used to describe sociodemographic risk factors and sleep practices; bedding was studied in homes with a model positioned where each infant was found sleeping that morning.

RESULTS

The groups differed with respect to five sociodemographic risk factors (p values all < or = 0.0001). In addition, infants at higher risk were more likely to have been placed to sleep prone (46%, p = 0.02) by parents who were less likely to be aware of the risk associated with the prone position (62% aware, p = 0.005). Infants at higher risk had softer bedding (p < 0.0001, 54.1+/-17.2 cm2 vs 33.7+/-7.7 cm2 in contact with model), which caused more limitation of carbon dioxide dispersal (p = 0.008; CO2 retained, 0.60%+/-0.15% vs 0.34%+/-0.05%).

CONCLUSIONS

A series of infants who are at high risk for SIDS because of sociodemographic factors more often sleep on bedding that has physical properties favoring rebreathing, and their parents are less often aware of the risk associated with prone sleeping.

摘要

目的

开展本研究以确定婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)高风险或低风险婴儿所使用的床上用品在有利于呼出气体再呼吸的物理特性方面是否存在差异。

研究设计

我们使用机械模型比较了床上用品的柔软度和二氧化碳扩散限制情况。通过问卷调查描述社会人口统计学风险因素和睡眠习惯;在每个婴儿当天早晨被发现睡觉的家中,将模型放置在床上用品所在位置进行研究。

结果

两组在五个社会人口统计学风险因素方面存在差异(p值均≤0.0001)。此外,高风险婴儿更有可能被父母放置为俯卧睡眠(46%,p = 0.02),而这些父母不太可能意识到俯卧位相关风险(62%知晓,p = 0.005)。高风险婴儿使用的床上用品更柔软(p < 0.0001,与模型接触面积为54.1±17.2平方厘米,而低风险婴儿为33.7±7.7平方厘米),这导致二氧化碳扩散受到更多限制(p = 0.008;保留的二氧化碳为0.60%±0.15%,而低风险婴儿为0.34%±0.05%)。

结论

一系列因社会人口统计学因素而处于SIDS高风险的婴儿更常睡在具有有利于再呼吸物理特性的床上用品上,并且他们的父母较少意识到俯卧睡眠相关风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验