Suppr超能文献

两种胰岛免疫隔离方法的比较

Comparison of two methods of pancreas islets immunoisolation.

作者信息

Orłowski T, Sitarek E, Tatarkiewicz K, Sabat M, Antosiak M

机构信息

Transplantation Institute, Warsaw School of Medicine, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 1997 Dec;20(12):701-3.

PMID:9506786
Abstract

The efficacy of two methods of Langerhans islets immunoisolation was compared. For this purpose the function of islets encapsulated with alginate/polyethylenimine/protamine/heparin (APPH) or with alginate/poly-L-lisine/alginate (APA) membranes was assessed: in vitro according to their survival and response to glucose challenges, and in vivo according to their capability to provide sufficient insulin delivery to maintain normal fasting blood glucose following xenotransplantation to streptozotocin diabetic mice. In vitro insulin secretion and the response to glucose challenge of APPH and APA encapsulated islets were comparable to free islets. In vivo intraperitoneal concordant xenotransplantation of APA encapsulated rat islets reversed the diabetic state of streptozotocin diabetic mice for a longer period, than APPH islet grafts. This study clearly demonstrated the inadequacy of in vitro methods in the prediction of in vivo results of islets transplantation.

摘要

比较了两种朗格汉斯胰岛免疫隔离方法的疗效。为此,评估了用海藻酸盐/聚乙烯亚胺/鱼精蛋白/肝素(APPH)或海藻酸盐/聚-L-赖氨酸/海藻酸盐(APA)膜包裹的胰岛的功能:在体外,根据其存活率和对葡萄糖刺激的反应进行评估;在体内,根据其在异种移植到链脲佐菌素糖尿病小鼠后提供足够胰岛素释放以维持正常空腹血糖的能力进行评估。体外实验中,APPH和APA包裹的胰岛的胰岛素分泌及对葡萄糖刺激的反应与游离胰岛相当。在体内,APA包裹的大鼠胰岛腹腔内协同异种移植比APPH胰岛移植能更长时间地逆转链脲佐菌素糖尿病小鼠的糖尿病状态。这项研究清楚地表明体外方法在预测胰岛移植体内结果方面的不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验