Pope A J, Toseland C D, Rushant B, Richardson S, McVey M, Hills J
SmithKline Beecham, The Frythe, Welwyn, Herts, UK.
Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Jan;43(1):109-19. doi: 10.1023/a:1018884322973.
The therapeutic potential of urease inhibition of Helicobacter pylori has been studied by examining the effect of the potent urease inhibitor, fluorofamide (N-(diaminophosphinyl)-4-fluorobenzenamide), on urease activity and bacterial survival in vivo and in vitro. In culture, acid protection in H. pylori was shown to be due to changes in the pH of the medium brought about by the release of ammonia. Both the acid protection and the ammonia release were completely blocked by fluorofamide at low doses (ED50 = approximately 100 nM). However, fluorofamide was unstable under acidic conditions (T1/2 = 5.7 min at pH 2). Despite this, fluorofamide was the best available compound to test in vivo. In ferrets naturally infected with H. mustelae, a single dose (50 mg/kg, per os) of fluorofamide completely inhibited bacterial urease. In repeat dosing studies, fluorofamide (50 mg/kg per os, three times a day) was compared with the Helicobacter triple therapy regime (amoxycillin, metronidazole, and bismuth subcitrate). Fluorofamide failed to eradicate the H. mustelae infection, compared to 80% eradication with triple therapy. However, histological samples showed a profound reduction in bacterial numbers following fluorofamide treatment. A combination of fluorofamide and amoxycillin was dosed to ferrets (seven days of treatment with 50 mg/kg fluorofamide plus 10 mg/kg amoxycillin per os twice a day); however, this failed to eradicate the infection, despite there being a reduction in bacterial numbers in 3/5 ferrets after 21 days after dosing stopped. It was concluded that urease inhibitors (either alone or in combination with antibiotics) are unlikely to have therapeutic potential for Helicobacter pylori infections. This is probably because, in vivo, some bacteria (perhaps dormant forms) are not entirely dependent upon urease for survival. However, given the acid instability of fluorofamide, the possibility that more stable urease inhibitors might have therapeutic potential, cannot be excluded.
通过研究强效脲酶抑制剂氟甲酰胺(N-(二氨基磷酰基)-4-氟苯甲酰胺)对脲酶活性以及体内外细菌存活的影响,来探究抑制幽门螺杆菌脲酶的治疗潜力。在培养过程中,幽门螺杆菌的酸保护作用被证明是由于氨释放导致培养基pH值变化所致。低剂量(ED50约为100 nM)的氟甲酰胺可完全阻断酸保护作用和氨释放。然而,氟甲酰胺在酸性条件下不稳定(pH 2时半衰期T1/2 = 5.7分钟)。尽管如此,氟甲酰胺仍是体内试验的最佳可用化合物。在自然感染鼬源幽门螺杆菌的雪貂中,单剂量(50 mg/kg,口服)的氟甲酰胺可完全抑制细菌脲酶。在重复给药研究中,将氟甲酰胺(50 mg/kg口服,每日三次)与幽门螺杆菌三联疗法(阿莫西林、甲硝唑和次枸橼酸铋)进行比较。与三联疗法80%的根除率相比,氟甲酰胺未能根除鼬源幽门螺杆菌感染。然而,组织学样本显示氟甲酰胺治疗后细菌数量大幅减少。将氟甲酰胺和阿莫西林联合给雪貂给药(50 mg/kg氟甲酰胺加10 mg/kg阿莫西林口服,每日两次,治疗七天);然而,尽管给药停止21天后3/5的雪貂细菌数量减少,但仍未能根除感染。得出的结论是,脲酶抑制剂(单独或与抗生素联合使用)对幽门螺杆菌感染不太可能具有治疗潜力。这可能是因为在体内,一些细菌(可能是休眠形式)并不完全依赖脲酶生存。然而,鉴于氟甲酰胺的酸不稳定性,不能排除更稳定的脲酶抑制剂可能具有治疗潜力的可能性。